Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769343›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2022

An automatic integrative method for learning interpretable communities of biological pathways.

Nicasia Beebe-Wang, Ayse B Dincer, Su-In Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicasia Beebe-WangPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-2665
Ayse B DincerPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
Su-In LeePaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.

Funding

Interpretable Machine Learning to Identify Alzheimer's Disease Therapeutic TargetsR01AG061132 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, SU-IN · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Opening the Black Box of Machine Learning ModelsR35GM128638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, SU-IN · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061132NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although knowledge of biological pathways is essential for interpreting results from computational biology studies, the growing number of pathway databases complicates efforts to efficiently perform pathway analysis due to high redundancies among pathways from different databases, and inconsistencies in how pathways are created and named. We introduce the PAthway Communities (PAC) framework, which reconciles pathways from different databases and reduces pathway redundancy by revealing informative groups with distinct biological functions. Uniquely applying the Louvain community detection algorithm to a network of 4847 pathways from KEGG, REACTOME and Gene Ontology databases, we identify 35 distinct and automatically annotated communities of pathways and show that they are consistent with expert-curated pathway categories. Further, we demonstrate that our pathway community network can be queried with new gene sets to provide biological context in terms of related pathways and communities. Our approach, combined with an interpretable web tool we provide, will help computational biologists more efficiently contextualize and interpret their biological findings.

Identifiers

PMID35769343
PMCPMC9228877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.