Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769315›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2022

Isolation and evaluation of quinoa (

Olga Luisa Tavano, Maria Julia de Miguel Amistá, Giani Del Ciello, Marilia Caroline Martini Rodrigues, Amanda Marcela Bono Nishida, Letícia Alves Valadares, Bruno Moreira Siqueira, Roseli Aparecida da Silva Gomes, Marco Túlio Parolini, Sinézio Inácio da Silva Junior

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Can quinoa (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga Luisa TavanoProThea - Research Group on Proteins for Health Promotion, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas, Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Julia de Miguel AmistáNutrition Department, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Giani Del CielloNutrition Department, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marilia Caroline Martini RodriguesNutrition Department, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Amanda Marcela Bono NishidaNutrition Department, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Letícia Alves ValadaresNutrition Department, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bruno Moreira SiqueiraProThea - Research Group on Proteins for Health Promotion, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas, Gerais, Brazil.
Roseli Aparecida da Silva GomesBiological and Natural Sciences Institute, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Brazil.
Marco Túlio ParoliniBiological and Natural Sciences Institute, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Brazil.
Sinézio Inácio da Silva JuniorProThea - Research Group on Proteins for Health Promotion, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas, Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Alfenas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the solubility profiles of quinoa grain proteins and applied a complete process for the isolation of its main protein fractions, namely: albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins, which corresponded to 26.96%, 41.3%, 1.7% and 23.16% of the total protein content, respectively. When these fractions were digested with pepsin followed by pancreatin, the degrees of hydrolysis achieved varied between 26.62% (for unheated globulin fraction) and 38.97% (for unheated glutelin), with casein reached 33.73% hydrolysis. After heating, the globulin hydrolysis degree increased to 34.7%, not significantly differing from casein. These results reflect its good susceptibility to hydrolysis by digestive enzymes, and this observation is reinforced with assays with pepsin, trypsin and chymotrypsin tested separately. Globulins, the largest protein fraction, showed promising results in additional assays regarding the amino acid profile, with limitation only for lysine in relation to the FAO standard, and the potential for releasing bioactive peptides after digestion. Although pepsin-digested globulin inhibited only 5% of ACE activity under the conditions tested, after 24h with the addition of pancreatin, the inhibition was 100%. Antioxidant activity (DPPH assay) also indicated very similar results, when hydrolysis with pepsin was inefficient in releasing antioxidant peptides, while hydrolysis by pancreatin led to 35 times greater results.

Indexed as

Antioxidant peptidesBioactive peptidesGlobulinsProtein solubility

Identifiers

PMID35769315
PMCPMC9234336
OpenAlexW4283159782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.