Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769234›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2022

Exposure to gambling promotions and gambling behaviours in Australian secondary school students.

Natasha Noble, Megan Freund, David Hill, Victoria White, Lucy Leigh, David Lambkin, Maree Scully, Robert Sanson-Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha NobleHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.
Megan FreundHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.
David HillCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Victoria WhiteCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Lucy LeighClinical Research Design, Information and Statistical Support, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305, Australia.
David LambkinClinical Research Design, Information and Statistical Support, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305, Australia.
Maree ScullyCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Robert Sanson-FisherHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUCancer Council Victoria · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Young people's gambling behaviours are associated with a range of individual, interpersonal and community factors. This study explored the association between exposure to types of gambling advertising and promotions and adolescent gambling behaviours. Methods: Students from two states answered gambling questions as part of the 2017 Australian Secondary Students' Alcohol and Drug (ASSAD) Survey. Students reported gambling behaviours (gambling in the last month, types of gambling activities), exposure to gambling promotions during the last 30 days (e.g. ads for gambling on TV, online, live studio crosses), and were assessed for problem gambling. Principal Component Analysis suggested four groups of gambling promotion exposure. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between gambling promotion exposure and student gambling, engagement in hard gambling activities in the last month, and problem or at risk gambling, controlling for a range of student characteristics. Results: Most students (81%) had been exposed to some form of gambling promotion or advertisement in the last month, most commonly TV, social media and sporting event advertisements. Exposure to online gambling ads (including websites, pop-ups on websites, and social media) in the last month was significantly associated with gambling in the last month, and being classified as an at risk or problem gambler; but not with participating in hard gambling activities. After adjusting for exposure to gambling advertising across categories, no other advertising exposure types were associated with adolescent gambling behaviours. Conclusions: Study findings point to the need to impose restrictions on gambling advertisements and promotions, particularly those presented online.

Indexed as

AdolescentsAdvertisingGamblingPromotionsYouth

Identifiers

PMID35769234
PMCPMC9234071
OpenAlexW4282596164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.