Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769205›Full record

ReviewDigital discovery2022

Deep generative models for peptide design.

Fangping Wan, Daphne Kontogiorgos-Heintz, Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Artificial intelligence catalyzes antimicrobial peptide design.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Computer-Aided Design ofACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. AI-assisted design of a VEGFR2 agonistic peptide that promotes angiogenesis and wound repair.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fangping WanMachine Biology Group, Departments of Psychiatry and Microbiology, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA cfuente@upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-3278
Daphne Kontogiorgos-HeintzMachine Biology Group, Departments of Psychiatry and Microbiology, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA cfuente@upenn.edu.
Cesar de la Fuente-NunezMachine Biology Group, Departments of Psychiatry and Microbiology, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA cfuente@upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-5629

Funding

Combining chemical and computational tools for predictive models of microbiome communitiesR35GM138201 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DE LA FUENTE, CESAR · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computers can already be programmed for superhuman pattern recognition of images and text. For machines to discover novel molecules, they must first be trained to sort through the many characteristics of molecules and determine which properties should be retained, suppressed, or enhanced to optimize functions of interest. Machines need to be able to understand, read, write, and eventually create new molecules. Today, this creative process relies on deep generative models, which have gained popularity since powerful deep neural networks were introduced to generative model frameworks. In recent years, they have demonstrated excellent ability to model complex distribution of real-word data (

Identifiers

PMID35769205
PMCPMC9189861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.