Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35769091›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2022

Emergency room imaging findings in patients presenting after COVID-19 vaccination.

Nadia Solomon, Anne Sailer, Akash Patel, Margarita V Revzin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadia SolomonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Anne SailerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Akash PatelDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Margarita V RevzinDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Data on potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccines remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the clinical presentations and imaging findings of emergency room (ER) patients presenting with suspected side effects or complications of recent COVID-19 vaccination. Materials and Methods: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of vaccinated patients who underwent imaging studies in the ER between December 2020 and August 2021 was conducted. Reports were analyzed for imaging modality, chief complaints, and imaging findings. Results: A total of 173 studies on 161 patients were included: 73 X-rays, 57 computed tomographys, 12 magnetic resonance imagings, and 31 ultrasounds. Analysis of the 168 reports dictated in these 173 studies revealed chest pain (27%), shortness of breath (17%), headache (12.5%), fever (10%), and cough (11.9%) as the most common presenting signs/symptoms. About 57.7% of reports showed no post-vaccine complications. Of the 42.3% of reports with findings, lung opacities/consolidation (36.6%) and cervical and/or axillary adenopathy (35.2%) were most commonly seen; other major findings included saddle embolus (1.4%) and vertebral artery occlusion (1.4%). Conclusion: Chest pain, cough, shortness of breath, and headache were the most common presenting symptoms in the ER after COVID-19 vaccination, and chest X-ray and computed tomography chest angiography were the most commonly ordered studies to assess vaccine-related complications. Lung opacities/consolidations were the most common findings. Given that vascular post-vaccine complications are considered the most dangerous and 2.8% of reports demonstrated positive vascular findings, concern for vascular complications should initiate appropriate imaging to ensure prompt diagnosis and management.

Indexed as

ComplicationCOVID-19Emergency radiologySide effectVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35769091
PMCPMC9235420
OpenAlexW4283069397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.