Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768901›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2022

Predictors of respiratory failure after thoracic surgery: a retrospective cohort study with comparison between lobar and sub-lobar resection.

Aldo Pezzuto, Beatrice Trabalza Marinucci, Alberto Ricci, Massimo Ciccozzi, Giuseppe Tonini, Michela D'Ascanio, Giulio Guerrieri, Maria Chianese, Silvia Castelli, Erino Angelo Rendina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A rare case of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aldo PezzutoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-2260
Beatrice Trabalza MarinucciDepartment of General and Specialistic Surgery 'P Stefanini', Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Alberto RicciDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Massimo CiccozziDepartment of Epidemiology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe ToniniDepartment of Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Michela D'AscanioDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Giulio GuerrieriDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-3293
Maria ChianeseDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Silvia CastelliDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Erino Angelo RendinaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOnly approximately 15% of patients with lung cancer are suitable for surgery and clinical postoperative outcomes vary. The aim of this study was to investigate variables associated with post-surgery respiratory failure in this patient cohort.

methodsPatients who underwent surgery for lung cancer were retrospectively studied for respiratory function. All patients had undergone lung resection by a mini-thoracotomy approach. The study population was divided into two subgroups for comparison: lobectomy group, who underwent lobar resection; and sub-lobar resection group.

resultsA total of 85 patients were included, with a prevalence of lung cancer stage IA and adenocarcinoma histotype. Lobectomy (versus sub-lobar resection), the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a COPD assessment test (CAT) score >10, were all associated with an increased risk of respiratory failure. The partial pressure of arterial oxygen decreased more in the lobectomy group than in the sub-lobar resection group following surgery, with a significant postoperative between-group difference in values. Postoperative CAT scores were also better in the sub-lobar resection group.

conclusionsPost-surgical variations in functional parameters were greater in the group treated by lobectomy. COPD, high CAT score and surgery type were associated with postoperative development of respiratory failure.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyThoracic SurgeryHumansPneumonectomyRetrospective StudiesCOPDLung cancerlung surgeryrespiratory failurerespiratory function variabilitytype of lung resection

Identifiers

PMID35768901
PMCPMC9251996
OpenAlexW4283716741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.