Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768824›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2022

Acetazolamide modulates intracranial pressure directly by its action on the cerebrospinal fluid secretion apparatus.

Dagne Barbuskaite, Eva K Oernbo, Jonathan H Wardman, Trine L Toft-Bertelsen, Eller Conti, Søren N Andreassen, Niklas J Gerkau, Christine R Rose, Nanna MacAulay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The NaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dagne BarbuskaiteDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eva K OernboDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jonathan H WardmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Trine L Toft-BertelsenDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eller ContiDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren N AndreassenDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niklas J GerkauInstitute of Neurobiology, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christine R RoseInstitute of Neurobiology, Heinrich Heine University, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nanna MacAulayDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark. macaulay@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-6600
University of Copenhagen · DKHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR2795Lundbeckfonden R276-2018-403Lundbeckfonden,Denmark R303-2018-3005Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF17OC0024718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is observed in many neurological pathologies, e.g. hydrocephalus and stroke. This condition is routinely relieved with neurosurgical approaches, since effective and targeted pharmacological tools are still lacking. The carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide (AZE), may be employed to treat elevated ICP. However, its effectiveness is questioned, its location of action unresolved, and its tolerability low. Here, we determined the efficacy and mode of action of AZE in the rat .

methodsWe employed in vivo approaches including ICP and cerebrospinal fluid secretion measurements in anaesthetized rats and telemetric monitoring of ICP and blood pressure in awake rats in combination with ex vivo choroidal radioisotope flux assays and transcriptomic analysis.

resultsAZE effectively reduced the ICP, irrespective of the mode of drug administration and level of anaesthesia. The effect appeared to occur via a direct action on the choroid plexus and an associated decrease in cerebrospinal fluid secretion, and not indirectly via the systemic action of AZE on renal and vascular processes. Upon a single administration, the reduced ICP endured for approximately 10 h post-AZE delivery with no long-term changes of brain water content or choroidal transporter expression. However, a persistent reduction of ICP was secured with repeated AZE administrations throughout the day.

conclusionsAZE lowers ICP directly via its ability to reduce the choroid plexus CSF secretion, irrespective of mode of drug administration.

Indexed as

Intracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureAcetazolamideAnimalsCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsCerebrospinal FluidChoroid PlexusRatsAcetazolamideCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsChoroid plexusCSF secretionHCO3 − transportersHydrocephalusICPIIH

Identifiers

PMID35768824
PMCPMC9245291
OpenAlexW4283737871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.