Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768791›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Mutations of 1p genes do not consistently abrogate tumor suppressor functions in 1p-intact neuroblastoma.

Chik Hong Kuick, Jia Ying Tan, Deborah Jasmine, Tohari Sumanty, Alvin Y J Ng, Byrrappa Venkatesh, Huiyi Chen, Eva Loh, Sudhanshi Jain, Wan Yi Seow and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chik Hong KuickDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Jia Ying TanNeurodevelopment and Cancer Laboratory, NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
Deborah JasmineNeurodevelopment and Cancer Laboratory, NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore.
Tohari SumantyComparative and Medical Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Alvin Y J NgComparative and Medical Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Byrrappa VenkateshComparative and Medical Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Huiyi ChenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Eva LohDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Sudhanshi JainDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Wan Yi SeowDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Eileen H Q NgDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Derrick W Q LianDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Shui Yen SohVIVA-KKH Paediatric Brain and Solid Tumour Programme, Children's Blood and Cancer Centre, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Kenneth T E ChangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Zhi Xiong ChenNeurodevelopment and Cancer Laboratory, NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117599, Singapore. zhixiong_chen@nus.edu.sg.
Amos H P LohVIVA-KKH Paediatric Brain and Solid Tumour Programme, Children's Blood and Cancer Centre, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore. amos.loh.h.p@singhealth.com.sg.
KK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SG

Funding

Children's Cancer Foundation Singapore Childhood Cancer RegistryVIVA Foundation for Children with Cancer VIVA-KKH Paediatric Brain and Solid Tumour Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeletion of 1p is associated with poor prognosis in neuroblastoma, however selected 1p-intact patients still experience poor outcomes. Since mutations of 1p genes may mimic the deleterious effects of chromosomal loss, we studied the incidence, spectrum and effects of mutational variants in 1p-intact neuroblastoma.

methodsWe characterized the 1p status of 325 neuroblastoma patients, and correlated the mutational status of 1p tumor suppressors and neuroblastoma candidate genes with survival outcomes among 100 1p-intact cases, then performed functional validation of selected novel variants of 1p36 genes identified from our patient cohort.

resultsAmong patients with adverse disease characteristics, those who additionally had 1p deletion had significantly worse overall survival. Among 100 tumor-normal pairs sequenced, somatic mutations of 1p tumor suppressors KIF1Bβ and CHD5 were most frequent (2%) after ALK and ATRX (8%), and BARD1 (3%). Mutations of neuroblastoma candidate genes were associated with other synchronous mutations and concurrent 11q deletion (P = 0.045). In total, 24 of 38 variants identified were novel and predicted to be deleterious or pathogenic. Functional validation identified novel KIF1Bβ I1355M variant as a gain-of-function mutation with increased expression and tumor suppressive activity, correlating with indolent clinical behavior; another novel variant CHD5 E43Q was a loss-of-function mutation with decreased expression and increased long-term cell viability, corresponding with aggressive disease characteristics.

conclusionsOur study showed that chromosome 1 gene mutations occurred frequently in 1p-intact neuroblastoma, but may not consistently abrogate the function of bonafide 1p tumor suppressors. These findings may augment the evolving model of compounding contributions of 1p gene aberrations toward tumor suppressor inactivation in neuroblastoma.

Indexed as

Genes, Tumor SuppressorNeuroblastomaChromosome AberrationsChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Cohort StudiesDNA HelicasesHumansMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsCHD5 protein, humanDNA HelicasesNerve Tissue ProteinsChromosome 1NeuroblastomaNext-generation sequencingSynchronous MutationsTumor suppressor

Identifiers

PMID35768791
PMCPMC9245282
OpenAlexW4283722362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.