Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768739›Full record

ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2022

Effect of oral administration of a single bolus of six different protein sources on digestive physiology of red seabream Pagrus major juveniles.

Koji Murashita, Fumiaki Takakuwa, Hiroyuki Matsunari, Hazuki Yoshinaga, Takeshi Yamamoto, Hiromi Oku, Hirofumi Furuita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koji MurashitaPhysiological Function Division, Aquaculture Research Department, Fisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, 224-1 Hiruda, Tamaki, Mie, 519-0423, Japan. kojim@affrc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-1426
Fumiaki TakakuwaUragami Station, Aquaculture Research Institute, Kindai University, 468-3, Uragami, Nachi-Katsuura, Higashimuro, Wakayama, 649-5145, Japan.
Hiroyuki MatsunariPhysiological Function Division, Aquaculture Research Department, Fisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, 224-1 Hiruda, Tamaki, Mie, 519-0423, Japan.
Hazuki YoshinagaPhysiological Function Division, Aquaculture Research Department, Fisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, 224-1 Hiruda, Tamaki, Mie, 519-0423, Japan.
Takeshi YamamotoPhysiological Function Division, Aquaculture Research Department, Fisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, 224-1 Hiruda, Tamaki, Mie, 519-0423, Japan.
Hiromi OkuPhysiological Function Division, Aquaculture Research Department, Fisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, 224-1 Hiruda, Tamaki, Mie, 519-0423, Japan.
Hirofumi FuruitaPhysiological Function Division, Aquaculture Research Department, Fisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, 224-1 Hiruda, Tamaki, Mie, 519-0423, Japan.
Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency · JPKindai University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP18K05837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reveal direct effects of various protein sources on digestive physiology of red seabream, Pagrus major (38.5 ± 0.4 g), six different protein sources of fishmeal (FM), soybean meal (SBM), corn gluten meal (CGM), soy protein concentrate (SPC), poultry by-product meal (PBM), and poultry-feather meal (PFM) were orally administered to fish (2 mg protein/g body weight) and sampled at 1.5 h and 3 h after administration. Gallbladder weight of fish administered FM, PBM, and PFM decreased after administration (p < 0.0001), while no difference was observed in the other ingredients compared to a non-protein sham control group, indicating that animal protein sources could more strongly stimulate bile secretion than plant protein sources in red seabream. Trypsin and chymotrypsin activity in the intestinal content markedly increased by the FM, SBM, and PFM administration (p < 0.0001). Lipase and amylase activity was also increased by FM and SBM but also by CGM for lipase and by PBM and PFM for amylase (p < 0.0001). These indicate that stimulation effect of the secretion of digestive enzymes is largely different among the protein sources. This might be due to the absorptive capacity of the protein source since intestinal absorption parameter genes (anpep, cpa, ggt1, and atp1a2) also increased by the FM, SBM, PBM or PFM (p < 0.05). In addition to the secretion levels of bile and digestive enzymes, gene expression levels of bile related genes (cyp7a1, cyp8b1, and shp) and digestion-regulating genes (casr and cck) were increased by the FM, SBM, PFM, and/or PBM administration, suggesting that animal proteins and SBM could be potent digestive stimulants compared to CGM and SPC. This study first revealed that single protein sources directly influence digestive enzyme secretion and bile secretion in fish. Information about the direct effect of each single source on digestive physiology could help to design feed formulation with less fishmeal.

Indexed as

PerciformesSea BreamAdministration, OralAmylasesAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary ProteinsDigestionDigestive System Physiological PhenomenaGlycine maxLipaseSoybean ProteinsAmylasesDietary ProteinsLipaseSoybean ProteinsCorn gluten mealDigestive physiologyFishmealPoultry by-product mealPoultry-feather mealRed seabreamSoybean mealSoy protein concentrate

Identifiers

PMID35768739
OpenAlexW4283698618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.