Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768706›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2022

How Peripheral Vestibular Damage Affects Velocity Storage: a Causative Explanation.

Amsal Madhani, Richard F Lewis, Faisal Karmali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amsal MadhaniJenks Vestibular Physiology Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard F LewisJenks Vestibular Physiology Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA.
Faisal KarmaliJenks Vestibular Physiology Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA. Faisal_karmali@meei.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-4954

Funding

Vestibular Precision: Physiology and PathophysiologyR01DC018287 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI KARMALI, FAISAL, LEWIS, RICHARD F · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative N000142012163NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Velocity storage is a centrally-mediated mechanism that processes peripheral vestibular inputs. One prominent aspect of velocity storage is its effect on dynamic responses to yaw rotation. Specifically, when normal human subjects are accelerated to constant angular yaw velocity, horizontal eye movements and perceived angular velocity decay exponentially with a time constant circa 15-30 s, even though the input from the vestibular periphery decays much faster (~ 6 s). Peripheral vestibular damage causes a time constant reduction, which is useful for clinical diagnoses, but a mechanistic explanation for the relationship between vestibular damage and changes in these behavioral dynamics is lacking. It has been hypothesized that Bayesian optimization determines ideal velocity storage dynamics based on statistics of vestibular noise and experienced motion. Specifically, while a longer time constant would make the central estimate of angular head velocity closer to actual head motion, it may also result in the accumulation of neural noise which simultaneously degrades precision. Thus, the brain may balance these two effects by determining the time constant that optimizes behavior. We applied a Bayesian optimal Kalman filter to determine the ideal velocity storage time constant for unilateral damage. Predicted time constants were substantially lower than normal and similar to patients. Building on our past work showing that Bayesian optimization explains age-related changes in velocity storage, we also modeled interactions between age-related hair cell loss and peripheral damage. These results provide a plausible mechanistic explanation for changes in velocity storage after peripheral damage. Results also suggested that even after peripheral damage, noise originating in the periphery or early central processing may remain relevant in neurocomputations. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that the brain optimizes velocity storage based on the vestibular signal-to-noise ratio.

Indexed as

Vestibule, LabyrinthBayes TheoremBrainEye MovementsHumansReflex, Vestibulo-OcularRotationBayesian optimizationhumannoiseprecisiontime constantunilateral

Identifiers

PMID35768706
PMCPMC9437187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.