Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768701›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Otolaryngologists' radiological assessment of nasal septum deviation symptomatology.

Thomas J Lepley, Roberto P Frusciante, Jennifer Malik, Alexander Farag, Bradley A Otto, Kai Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas J Lepley *Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-2571
Roberto P Frusciante *Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA.
Jennifer MalikDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Alexander FaragDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Bradley A OttoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Kai ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA. zhao.1949@osu.edu.

Funding

Objective evaluation of conductive olfactory losses & nasal obstruction symptomsR01DC013626 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, KAI · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
Endoscopic nasal sinus surgery simulator to optimize treatment outcomeR21DC017530 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, KAI · 2019 to 2020
$442k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013626NIDCD NIH HHS R21 017530NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNasal Septal Deviation (NSD) is one of the most common causes of nasal obstruction. This study aims to further examine the clinical utility of imaging assessment in the workup and management of symptomatic nasal septal deviation, across all levels of medical training. STUDY

designCross-sectional survey.

methodsCT scans of 10 confirmed NSD patients and 36 healthy controls (HC) were mixed and emailed through anonymous REDCap surveys to otolaryngologists in the US. The HC had no reported sinonasal obstruction symptoms-NOSE (NSD: 62.2 ± 12.5; HC: 5.69 ± 5.99, p < 0.05); SNOT-22 (NSD: 31.4 ± 14.5; HC: 9.72 ± 10.76, p < 0.05). The images consisted of a coronal slice at each subject's most deviated location. Participants were instructed to choose the patients suspected to present with symptoms of sinonasal obstruction.

results88 otolaryngologists responded to the survey. 18 were excluded due to incomplete responses. On average, they identified 64.2 ± 29.8% of symptomatic NSD subjects correctly, but misidentified 54.6 ± 34.6% of HC as symptomatic. Their decisions were strongly correlated to degree of NSD (r = 0.69, p < 0.05). There exists a significant degree of NSD among HC (38.7 ± 17.2%), which does not significantly differ from symptomatic subjects (51.0 + 18.7%, p = 0.09). Residents and fellows performed similarly, with responses correlated between levels of training (r = 0.84-0.96, p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe incorporation of a substantial number of otolaryngologists, large patient sample, and blind mixing with HC gives us greater insight to the relative contribution of the extent of septal deviation to symptoms of nasal obstruction. Although NSD is a common factor contributing to nasal obstruction, the results of this study suggest that it is difficult to reliably infer obstructive symptoms based on degree of NSD on CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Three.

Indexed as

Nasal ObstructionNose Deformities, AcquiredNose DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNasal SeptumOtolaryngologistsNasal obstructionSeptal deviationSeptoplasty

Identifiers

PMID35768701
PMCPMC10229233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.