ArticleJournal of neurology2022
Clinico-biological markers for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between duration of status epilepticus and clinical outcomes in adults: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically Ill Adults with Status Epilepticus.Neurocritical care · 2026Guideline
- Fluid Biomarkers of Neuro-Glial Injury in Human Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Exploring pathways leading to drug-resistant epilepsy for patients with cryptogenic new onset refractory status epilepticus.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicle proteomics identifies novel blood biomarkers for the early diagnosis of status epilepticus.Epilepsia · 2026Observational
- Personalized neuron-specific enolase level based on EEG pattern for prediction of poor outcome after cardiac arrest.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Ketogenic Diet Therapy for Adult Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES): A Case Series of Five Patients and Clinical Efficacy Analysis.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Status epilepticus: the score question.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Remote seizures and drug-resistant epilepsy after a first status epilepticus in adults.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Thyroid hormones and prognosis in adults with status epilepticus: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Neuropathology of New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE).Journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Clinico-biological markers for the prognosis of status epilepticus in adults.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of mortality, functional outcome and recovery after status epilepticus (SE) is a challenge. Biological and clinical markers have been proposed to reflect the brain injury or to monitor critical ill patients' severity. The aim of this study was to characterize short-term and long-term prognostic factors for SE patients hospitalized in intensive care unit. Patient's outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at discharge and after 6-12 months. We first assessed the univariate prognosis significance of 51 clinical, demographic or biochemical markers. Next, we built multivariate clinico-biological models by combining most important factors. Statistical models' performances were compared to those of two previous published scales STESS and mSTESS. Eighty-one patients were enrolled. Thirty-five patients showed a steady state while 46 patients clinically worsened at discharge: 14 died, 14 had persistent disability at 6-12 months and 18 recovered. Logistic regression analysis revealed that clinical markers (SE refractoriness, SE duration, de novo SE) were significant independent predictors of worsening while lipids markers and progranulin better predicted mortality. The association of clinico-biological variables allowed to accurately predict worsening at discharge (AUC > 0.72), mortality at discharge (AUC 0.83) and recovery at long-term (AUC 0.89). Previous scales provided lower prediction for worsening (AUC 0.63, STESS; 0.53, mSTESS) and mortality (AUC 0.56, STESS; 0.62, mSTESS) (p < 0.001). We proposed new clinico-biological models with a strong discrimination power for prediction of short- and long-term outcome of hospitalized status epilepticus patients. Their implementation in electronic devices may enhance their clinical liability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.