Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768417›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2022

A qualitative assessment of the pulmonary rehabilitation decision-making needs of patients living with COPD.

A C Barradell, C Bourne, B Alkhathlan, M Larkin, S J Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A C BarradellCentre for Exercise & Rehabilitation Science (CERS), NIHR Leicester BRC (Respiratory), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK. ab1081@le.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3688-8879
C BourneFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, UK.
B AlkhathlanCentre for Exercise & Rehabilitation Science (CERS), NIHR Leicester BRC (Respiratory), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
M LarkinSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Street, Birmingham, UK.
S J SinghCentre for Exercise & Rehabilitation Science (CERS), NIHR Leicester BRC (Respiratory), Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is highly evidenced but underutilised in patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A menu of centre and home-based programmes is available to facilitate uptake but is not routinely offered. An appraisal of the current PR referral approach compared to a menu-based approach was warranted to explore the decision-making needs of patients living with COPD when considering a referral to PR. Face-to-face or telephone, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients diagnosed with COPD and referred to PR and referring HCPs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the enhanced critical incident technique. 14 HCPs and 11 patients were interviewed (n = 25). Interview data generated 276 critical incidents which informed 28 categories (30 sub-categories). Five high-level themes captured patients' decision-making needs for PR: Understanding COPD, understanding PR, perceived ability to access PR, a desire to accept PR, and supporting the offer. A menu-based approach would further support patients' PR decision-making, however, insufficient knowledge of the programmes would limit its perceived feasibility and acceptability. The development of shared decision making interventions (e.g., a patient decision aid) to elicit patient-centred, meaningful discussions about the menu is suggested.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID35768417
PMCPMC9243001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.