Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768395›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2022

Conceptualizing citizenship in dementia: A scoping review of the literature.

Deborah O'Connor, Mariko Sakamoto, Kishore Seetharaman, Habib Chaudhury, Alison Phinney

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deborah O'ConnorSchool of Social Work, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mariko SakamotoCentre for Research on Personhood in Dementia, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-0324
Kishore SeetharamanDepartment of Gerontology, 1763Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-5620
Habib ChaudhuryDepartment of Gerontology, 1763Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-3776
Alison PhinneySchool of Nursing, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-0396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizenship has provided an important conceptual framework in dementia research and practice over the past fifteen years. To date, there has been no attempt to synthesize the multiple perspectives that have arisen in this literature. The purpose of this paper is to explore, reflect on, and contrast, the key concepts and trends in the citizenship discourse as it relates to people with dementia. Using a scoping review methodology, forty-nine articles were identified for review. Despite the use of different descriptors, thematic analysis revealed four core themes underpinning citizenship discourse: 1) the relationality of citizenship; 2) facilitated agency and autonomy; 3) attention to stigma, discrimination and exclusion; and 4) recognition of the possibilities of identity and growth. Overall, this scoping review found a major emphasis on expanding definitions of agency and autonomy to render citizenship unconditional and inclusive of the diverse life experiences of people living with dementia. Notably, there is recognition that a more intersectional lens for embedding the subjective experience within a broader socio-political context is needed. Whilst the adoption of a citizenship lens in dementia research and practice has had real-world implications for policy and research, its exploration and use continue to be led by academics, highlighting the importance that future research involve input form people with dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaPersonal AutonomyCitizenshipHumansSocial Stigmaagency and autonomycitizenshipDementiahuman rightsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35768395
PMCPMC9483710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.