Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768091›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Young adults' cigarillo risk perceptions, attention to warning labels and perceptions of proposed pictorial warnings: a focus group study.

Stefanie K Gratale, Michelle Jeong, Anupreet Sidhu, Zeinab Safi, Andrew A Strasser, Cristine D Delnevo, Olivia A Wackowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Perceived Effectiveness of Cigar Warnings in Discouraging Blunt Use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. The Impact of Cigarillo Text Warning Presence and Size on Young Adults' Cigarillo Risk Beliefs, Knowledge, Appeal, and Use Intentions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  6. The Role of Harm Visibility for Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigars.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie K GrataleCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA skg83@cts.rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-6304
Michelle JeongCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Anupreet SidhuPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Zeinab SafiCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8335-9566
Andrew A StrasserPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cristine D DelnevoCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Olivia A WackowskiCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Tobacco Industry Marketing CoreU54CA229973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DELNEVO, CRISTINE D · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
The Impact of E-cigarette Marketing Features on Youths' E-cigarette Perceptions and Use IntentionsK01CA242591 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JEONG, MICHELLE · 2019 to 2023
$964k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA242591NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough cigars pose similar health risks to cigarettes, they are not uniformly required to carry a warning label on their packaging in the USA. The US Food and Drug Administration's 2016 deeming rule established a cigar warning requirement, but it was challenged in federal court for failing to document warning effects on prevention/cessation, thus necessitating an evidentiary base for such requirements. We sought to explore young adult users' understanding of cigarillo risks and addictiveness, as well as their perceptions of current (voluntary) and proposed cigar warning labels.

designIn December 2020-January 2021, we conducted eight focus groups with young adult cigarillo smokers. We asked participants their first associations of cigarillos and beliefs about product harms/addictiveness, and then discussed existing warning labels and examples of potential pictorial warnings.

settingFocus groups were conducted remotely via the Adobe Connect platform, with participants from 20 US states.

participantsParticipants included 42 young adults (ages 18-29; 50% male), who were recent cigarillo users (ie, past 30 days) or less frequent users (ie, past 12 months).

resultsParticipants frequently used cigarillos as blunts and often conveyed uncertainty about cigarillo risks and addictiveness, in general and relative to cigarettes. Participants typically paid little attention to current text warnings, but many expressed that pictorial warnings would more effectively promote knowledge of product risks and discourage use among prospective users.

conclusionsUS young adult cigarillo users may lack knowledge about product risks and addictiveness. Standardised warning requirements, particularly pictorial labels, may help address this knowledge gap and deter use.

Indexed as

Product LabelingTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleProduct PackagingProspective StudiesYoung AdultPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID35768091
PMCPMC9240892
OpenAlexW4283690398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.