Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35768080›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

FutureMS cohort profile: a Scottish multicentre inception cohort study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Patrick K A Kearns, Sarah J Martin, Jessie Chang, Rozanna Meijboom, Elizabeth N York, Yingdi Chen, Christine Weaver, Amy Stenson, Katarzyna Hafezi, Stacey Thomson and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06001138 (FutureMS-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06001138 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

FutureMS-2: Clinical, Laboratory, and Genomic Predictors of Disease Activity in People Diagnosed With Relapsing Onset Multiple Sclerosis: an Observational Cohort and Scottish Precision Medicine Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2021 to 2029Enrolled440ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick K A KearnsAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK P.Kearns@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0053-4200
Sarah J MartinCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jessie ChangAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
Rozanna MeijboomCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3346-260X
Elizabeth N YorkCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4310-8607
Yingdi ChenAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4953-9790
Christine WeaverAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
Amy StensonAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
Katarzyna HafeziWellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Edinburgh, UK.
Stacey ThomsonInstitute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Elizabeth FreyerInstitute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lee MurphyWellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Edinburgh, UK.
Adil HarroudDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, San Francisco, California, USA.
Peter FoleyAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
David HuntAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
Margaret McLeodDepartment of Neurology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
Jonathon O'RiordanTayside Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, University of Dundee Division of Neuroscience, Dundee, UK.
F J Carod-ArtalDepartment of Neurology, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.
Niall J J MacDougallAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4195-5538
Sergio E BaranziniDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, San Francisco, California, USA.
Adam D WaldmanCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Peter ConnickCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3892-8037
Siddharthan ChandranAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-1593
University of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBNIHR Wellcome Trust Southampton Clinical Research Facility · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBRaigmore Hospital · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBWishaw General Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/N50192X/1The Dunhill Medical Trust R380R/1114Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated, neuroinflammatory disease of the central nervous system and in industrialised countries is the most common cause of progressive neurological disability in working age persons. While treatable, there is substantial interindividual heterogeneity in disease activity and response to treatment. Currently, the ability to predict at diagnosis who will have a benign, intermediate or aggressive disease course is very limited. There is, therefore, a need for integrated predictive tools to inform individualised treatment decision making.

participantsEstablished with the aim of addressing this need for individualised predictive tools, FutureMS is a nationally representative, prospective observational cohort study of 440 adults with a new diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS living in Scotland at the time of diagnosis between May 2016 and March 2019. FINDINGS TO DATE: The study aims to explore the pathobiology and determinants of disease heterogeneity in MS and combines detailed clinical phenotyping with imaging, genetic and biomarker metrics of disease activity and progression. Recruitment, baseline assessment and follow-up at year 1 is complete. Here, we describe the cohort design and present a profile of the participants at baseline and 1 year of follow-up. FUTURE PLANS: A third follow-up wave for the cohort has recently begun at 5 years after first visit and a further wave of follow-up is funded for year 10. Longer-term follow-up is anticipated thereafter.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionHumansProspective StudiesBiomarkersepidemiologyinternal medicinemultiple sclerosisneurogeneticsneurologyneuroradiology

Identifiers

PMID35768080
PMCPMC9244691
OpenAlexW4283697410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.