Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767998›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Is it Necessary to Evaluate Fear of Childbirth in Pregnant Women? A Scoping Review.

Cibele Santini Oliveira Imakawa, Mariane Nunes Nadai, Monica Reis, Silvana Maria Quintana, Elaine Christine Dantas Moises

Full text readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of legal regulation on elective cesarean sections in a secondary complexity maternity hospital in São Paulo state.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cibele Santini Oliveira ImakawaFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-2930
Mariane Nunes NadaiFaculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6706-7117
Monica ReisPan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6938-6288
Silvana Maria QuintanaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-786X
Elaine Christine Dantas MoisesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9099-4544

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review concepts, definitions, and findings about fear of childbirth (FOC).

methodsA bibliographic review was carried out through the main scientific databases in 2020.

resultsAll 32 articles considered potentially relevant were analyzed. A recent study suggests that the global prevalence of FOC can reach up to 14%. Factors such as parity, gestational age, previous birth experience, age and nationality of the woman seem to influence FOC.

conclusionFear of childbirth could be related to an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes such as maternal request for cesarean delivery, preterm birth, prolonged labor, postpartum depression, and post-traumatic stress. These evidence highlight the importance of the discussion regarding this topic.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePremature BirthDelivery, ObstetricFearFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35767998
PMCPMC10032056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read4
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.