ArticleAquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022
Cross-species comparison of chemical inhibition of human and Xenopus iodotyrosine deiodinase.
Article in Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A 2024 inventory of test methods relevant to thyroid hormone system disruption for human health and environmental regulatory hazard assessment.Open research Europe · 2024Review
- Assessing utility of thyroid in vitro screening assays through comparisons to observed impacts in vivo.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2023Review
- Cross-species applicability of an adverse outcome pathway network for thyroid hormone system disruption.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023Review
- Antibodies Regulate Dual-Function Enzyme IYD to Induce Functional Synergy between Metabolism and Thermogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The transition to include in vitro-based data in chemical hazard assessment has resulted in the development and implementation of screening assays to cover a diversity of biological pathways, including recently added assays to interrogate chemical disruption of proteins relevant to thyroid signaling pathways. Iodotyrosine deiodinase (IYD), the iodide recycling enzyme, is one such thyroid-relevant endpoint for which a human-based screening assay has recently been developed and used to screen large libraries of chemicals. Presented here is the development of an amphibian IYD inhibition assay and its implementation to conduct a cross-species comparison between chemical inhibition of mammalian and non-mammalian IYD enzyme activity. The successful development of an amphibian IYD inhibition assay was based on demonstration of sufficient IYD enzyme activity in several tissues collected from larval Xenopus laevis. With this new assay, 154 chemicals were tested in concentration-response to provide a basis for comparison of relative chemical potency to results obtained from the human IYD assay. Most chemicals exhibited similar inhibition in both assays, with less than 25% variation in median inhibition for 120 of 154 chemicals and 85% concordance in categorization of "active" (potential IYD inhibitor) versus "inactive". For chemicals that produced 50% or greater inhibition in both assays, rank-order potency was similar, with the majority of the IC50s varying by less than 2-fold (and all within an order of magnitude). Most differences resulted from greater maximum inhibition or higher chemical potency observed with human IYD. This strong cross-species agreement suggests that results from the human-based assay would be conservatively predictive of chemical effects on amphibian IYD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.