Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767922›Full record

ArticleAquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Cross-species comparison of chemical inhibition of human and Xenopus iodotyrosine deiodinase.

Jennifer H Olker, Joseph J Korte, Jonathan T Haselman, Michael W Hornung, Sigmund J Degitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Cross-species applicability of an adverse outcome pathway network for thyroid hormone system disruption.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer H OlkerGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804, USA. Electronic address: olker.jennifer@epa.gov.
Joseph J KorteGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Jonathan T HaselmanGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Michael W HornungGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Sigmund J DegitzGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition to include in vitro-based data in chemical hazard assessment has resulted in the development and implementation of screening assays to cover a diversity of biological pathways, including recently added assays to interrogate chemical disruption of proteins relevant to thyroid signaling pathways. Iodotyrosine deiodinase (IYD), the iodide recycling enzyme, is one such thyroid-relevant endpoint for which a human-based screening assay has recently been developed and used to screen large libraries of chemicals. Presented here is the development of an amphibian IYD inhibition assay and its implementation to conduct a cross-species comparison between chemical inhibition of mammalian and non-mammalian IYD enzyme activity. The successful development of an amphibian IYD inhibition assay was based on demonstration of sufficient IYD enzyme activity in several tissues collected from larval Xenopus laevis. With this new assay, 154 chemicals were tested in concentration-response to provide a basis for comparison of relative chemical potency to results obtained from the human IYD assay. Most chemicals exhibited similar inhibition in both assays, with less than 25% variation in median inhibition for 120 of 154 chemicals and 85% concordance in categorization of "active" (potential IYD inhibitor) versus "inactive". For chemicals that produced 50% or greater inhibition in both assays, rank-order potency was similar, with the majority of the IC50s varying by less than 2-fold (and all within an order of magnitude). Most differences resulted from greater maximum inhibition or higher chemical potency observed with human IYD. This strong cross-species agreement suggests that results from the human-based assay would be conservatively predictive of chemical effects on amphibian IYD.

Indexed as

Iodide PeroxidaseWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsHumansIodidesMammalsThyroid GlandXenopus laevisIodide PeroxidaseIodidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAmphibianEndocrine disruptionIodotyrosine deiodinaseScreeningThyroidXenopus

Identifiers

PMID35767922
PMCPMC9887787
OpenAlexW4282926151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.