Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767527›Full record

ReviewThe New England journal of medicine2022

The Vaccine-Hesitant Moment.

Heidi J Larson, Emmanuela Gakidou, Christopher J L Murray

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The New England journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 268 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Testing autonomous motivation as a mechanism of anticipated regret intervention techniques for seasonal flu vaccination.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  12. The Association between Message Framing and Intention to Vaccinate Predictive of Hepatitis A Vaccine Uptake.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Trial
  13. Reminders, but not monetary incentives, increase COVID-19 booster uptake.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heidi J LarsonFrom the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle (H.J.L., E.G., C.J.L.M.); and the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (H.J.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-8477-7583
Emmanuela GakidouFrom the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle (H.J.L., E.G., C.J.L.M.); and the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (H.J.L.).
Christopher J L MurrayFrom the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle (H.J.L., E.G., C.J.L.M.); and the Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (H.J.L.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

VaccinationVaccination HesitancyVaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35767527
PMCPMC9258752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.