Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767523›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Non-linear susceptibility to interferences in declarative memory formation.

Malen D Moyano, Giulia Carbonari, Matías Bonilla, María E Pedreira, Luis I Brusco, Laura Kaczer, Cecilia Forcato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malen D MoyanoLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Giulia CarbonariLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Matías BonillaLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María E PedreiraConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luis I BruscoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura KaczerConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cecilia ForcatoLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Instituto Tecnológico (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-5954-4008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After encoding, memories go through a labile state followed by a stabilization process known as consolidation. Once consolidated they can enter a new labile state after the presentation of a reminder of the original memory, followed by a period of re-stabilization (reconsolidation). During these periods of lability the memory traces can be modified. Currently, some studies show a rapid stabilization after 30 min, while others show that stabilization occurs after longer periods (e.g. > 6 h). Here we investigate the effect of an interference treatment on declarative memory consolidation, comparing distinct time intervals after acquisition. On day 1, participants learned a list of non- syllable pairs (List 1). 5 min, 30 min, 3 h or 8 h later, they received an interference list (List 2) that acted as an amnesic agent. On day 2 (48 h after training) participants had to recall List 1 first, followed by List 2. We found that the List 1 memory was susceptible to interference when List 2 was administered 5 min or 3 h after learning but not when it was administered 30 min or 8 h after. We propose the possibility that this rapid memory protection could be induced by a fast and transient neocortical integration. Our results open a discussion about the contribution of molecular and systemic aspects to memory consolidation.

Indexed as

MemoryMemory ConsolidationHumansLearningMental Recall

Identifiers

PMID35767523
PMCPMC9242448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.