ArticleJAMA network open2022
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Term Neonates.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors of neonatal stroke from different origins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke Related to Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Two Case Reports.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Outcome and epilepsy following neonatal stroke in the Italian Registry of Infantile Thrombosis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Risk factors for neonatal brain injury in neonates born to mothers with preeclampsia: a retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Relationship between nutritional assessment and nutritional risk screening in hospitalized children with cerebral palsy: a single-center prospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Risk Factors and Prognostic Models in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Insights From ASPECTS-Net Water Uptake.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Maternal Overweight and Obesity and Risk of Perinatal Ischemic Stroke: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Neurology · 2025Article
- Early detection of cerebral sinus venous thrombosis in an extremely low birth weight infant using cranial ultrasound-case report and literature review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Review
- Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke: how informative is the placenta?Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Features of Physical and Psychomotor Development in Children with Brain Ischemia.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Quality and Content Concordance of International Clinical Guidelines on Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Using the AGREE II Instrument: An Updated Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Development of a Bedside Tool to Predict the Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy in Term-Born Neonates.JAMA pediatrics · 2023Article
- The new Italian registry of infantile thrombosis (RITI): A reflection on its journey, challenges and pitfalls.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- The Global Pregnancy Collaboration (CoLab) symposium on short- and long-term outcomes in offspring whose mothers had preeclampsia: A scoping review of clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) is a focal brain injury in term neonates that is identified postnatally but is presumed to occur near the time of birth. Many pregnancy, delivery, and fetal factors have been associated with PAIS, but early risk detection is lacking; thus, targeted treatment and prevention efforts are currently limited. Objective: To develop and validate a diagnostic risk prediction model that uses common clinical factors to predict the probability of PAIS in a term neonate. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study, a prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression with registry-based case data collected between January 2003, and March 2020, from the Alberta Perinatal Stroke Project, Canadian Cerebral Palsy Registry, International Pediatric Stroke Study, and Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition study. Criteria for inclusion were term birth and no underlying medical conditions associated with stroke diagnosis. Records with more than 20% missing data were excluded. Variable selection was based on peer-reviewed literature. Data were analyzed in September 2021. Exposures: Clinical pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal factors associated with PAIS as common data elements across the 4 registries. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the discriminative accuracy of the model predicting PAIS, measured by the concordance statistic (C statistic). Results: Of 2571 term neonates in the initial analysis (527 [20%] case and 2044 [80%] control individuals; gestational age range, 37-42 weeks), 1389 (54%) were male, with a greater proportion of males among cases compared with controls (318 [60%] vs 1071 [52%]). The final model was developed using 1924 neonates, including 321 cases (17%) and 1603 controls (83%), and 9 clinical factors associated with risk of PAIS in term neonates: maternal age, tobacco exposure, recreational drug exposure, preeclampsia, chorioamnionitis, intrapartum maternal fever, emergency cesarean delivery, low 5-minute Apgar score, and male sex. The model demonstrated good discrimination between cases and controls (C statistic, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.76) and good model fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .20). Internal validation techniques yielded similar C statistics (0.73 [95% CI, 0.69-0.77] with bootstrap resampling, 10-fold cross-validated area under the curve, 0.72 [bootstrap bias-corrected 95% CI, 0.69-0.76]), as did a sensitivity analysis using cases and controls from Alberta, Canada, only (C statistic, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.77). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that clinical variables can be used to develop and internally validate a model to predict the risk of PAIS in term neonates, with good predictive performance and strong internal validity. Identifying neonates with a high probability of PAIS who could then be screened for early diagnosis and treatment may be associated with reductions in lifelong morbidity for affected individuals and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.