Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767178›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2022

Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Therapies.

Bhaskar Bhardwaj, Joaquin E Cigarroa, Firas Zahr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bhaskar BhardwajDivision of Cardiology, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR, United States.
Joaquin E CigarroaDivision of Cardiology, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR, United States.
Firas ZahrDivision of Cardiology, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR, United States. zahr@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-8880
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this review, we have focused on the currently available transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies, device selection, as well as role and management of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the setting of other transcatheter valvular procedures. RECENT

findingsIn this review, we have enlisted the recently finished as well as ongoing trials in the percutaneous tricuspid valve therapies. TR is highly prevalent yet remains underrecognized and is often untreated. TR has traditionally been managed conservatively with medical therapies including diuretics for volume management, whereas surgical therapies are reserved for those undergoing left-sided valvular surgery. Although the transcatheter devices for tricuspid repair and replacement are in clinical trials, the experience to date for their effectiveness and safety has been reassuring.

Indexed as

Heart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTricuspid Valve InsufficiencyCardiac CatheterizationHumansTreatment OutcomeTricuspid ValveTranscatheter tricuspid valve repairTranscatheter tricuspid valve replacementTricuspid regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID35767178
OpenAlexW4283716201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.