Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767173›Full record

Trial reportHepatology international2022

Two-year risedronate treatment for osteoporosis in patients with esophageal varices: a non-randomized clinical trial.

Lívia Alves Amaral Santos, Talles Bazeia Lima, Hélio Rubens de Carvalho Nunes, Xingshun Qi, Fernando Gomes Romeiro

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hepatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lívia Alves Amaral Santos *Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, Gastroenterology Division-São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Júnior s/n, Botucatu, SP, CEP 18618-687, Brazil.
Talles Bazeia Lima *Internal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, Gastroenterology Division-São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Júnior s/n, Botucatu, SP, CEP 18618-687, Brazil.
Hélio Rubens de Carvalho NunesPublic Health Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Xingshun QiGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Command, Liaoning, Sheng, China.
Fernando Gomes RomeiroInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, Gastroenterology Division-São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rubião Júnior s/n, Botucatu, SP, CEP 18618-687, Brazil. fernando.romeiro@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-6895
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CN

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/22572-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/07117-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisphosphonates are the mainstay of osteoporosis treatment, but their use for patients with esophageal varices has been avoided due to the risk of esophagitis, which may cause variceal bleeding. Since most clinical trials assessing osteoporosis treatment last 2-3 years, this study aimed to evaluate a 2-year risedronate treatment for patients with esophageal varices and liver cirrhosis.

methodsThe study received Institutional Review Board approval, and the sample was divided into two groups according to bone mineral density (BMD). Cirrhosis severity and endoscopic findings at baseline were similar between the groups. The intervention group had 51 patients with osteoporosis, who received oral risedronate 35 mg weekly plus calcium and vitamin D supplements. The control group had 51 patients with osteopenia, receiving only the supplements. Scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopies and BMD measurements were carried out.

resultsThe adjusted esophagitis risk was higher in the intervention group; however, none of the subjects had digestive bleeding. Lumbar spine BMD increased in the intervention group (- 3.06 ± 0.71 to - 2.33 ± 0.90; p < 0.001) and in the control group (- 1.38 ± 0.77 to - 1.10 ± 1.05; p = 0.012). Femoral neck BMD did not change in the intervention group (- 1.64 ± 0.91 to - 1.71 ± 0.95; p = 0.220), but tended to decrease in the control group (- 1.00 ± 0.74 to - 1.09 ± 0.82; p = 0.053).

conclusionOral risedronate was effective and did not cause gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices under endoscopic surveillance.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsEsophageal and Gastric VaricesEsophagitisOsteoporosisBone DensityGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLiver CirrhosisRisedronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsRisedronic AcidBisphosphonatesBone mineral densityCirrhosisDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryEndoscopyEsophageal varicesEsophagitisGastrointestinal hemorrhageOsteopeniaOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID35767173
OpenAlexW4283733362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.