Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767127›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

A mixed method study of medical oncologists' perceived barriers and motivators to addressing long-term effects in breast cancer survivors.

Alex J Fauer, Patricia A Ganz, Eden R Brauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acceptability of a practical geriatric assessment intervention with older adult cancer survivors and community health workers/promotoras: a qualitative investigation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The implementation of a novel adult cancer survivorship curriculum in a family medicine residency program: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Exploring what constitutes "a good day" for individuals living with advanced cancer: a qualitative interview study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex J FauerDivision of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Patricia A GanzDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eden R BrauerCenter for Cancer Control and Prevention Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. erbrauer@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4895-1748

Funding

Harnessing the EHR for the Delivery of Supportive Care in an Oncology SettingK08CA252615 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BRAUER, EDEN R. · 2021 to 2025
$934k
Breast Cancer Research Foundation BCRF-20-056NCI NIH HHS K08 CA252615NCI NIH HHS K08CA252615-01A1Susan G. Komen SAC170009UCLA National Clinician Scholars Program UCLA Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to identify oncologist-reported barriers and motivators in addressing long-term effects with breast cancer survivors.

methodsThis study is a secondary analysis of data from a survey of U.S. medical oncologists (n = 217) about breast cancer survivorship care in clinical practice. Using both closed- and open-ended questions, we asked oncologists to report barriers and motivators they perceived in addressing long-term effects with breast cancer patients. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and rank items endorsed by oncologists in analyses of quantitative data; content analysis was used to identify salient categories of barriers and motivators in qualitative data.

resultsKey barriers to managing physical long-term effects included lack of time during appointments (n = 128 oncologists, 59%) and perceived lack of evidence-based interventions (n = 89, 41%). With respect to psychosocial effects, oncologists reported lack of knowledge (n = 88, 40.6%) and challenges making referrals to mental health providers (n = 115, 53%). From the qualitative data, three distinct barrier categories emerged: "Competing priorities during brief appointments;" "Discussing long-term effects-Who? What? When?;" and "Beyond my expertise and comfort level." Two motivator categories emerged: "I owe it to them;" and "Giving people a life worth living."

conclusionOncologists' key motivators for addressing long-term effects were focused on professional values, relationships with survivors, and their commitment to prioritizing patients' quality of life. Future efforts should leverage oncologists' professional and interpersonal motivators to enhance the delivery of survivorship care for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsOncologistsFemaleHumansQuality of LifeSurvivorsBreast cancerCancer survivorshipLong-term and late effectsOncologists

Identifiers

PMID35767127
PMCPMC9287210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.