Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767077›Full record

SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2022

Systematic review about complementary medical hyperthermia in oncology.

Christina Maria Liebl, Sabine Kutschan, Jennifer Dörfler, Lukas Käsmann, Jutta Hübner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07564440 (Clinical and Biological Safety Study of the BTT Hyperthermia in Adult Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07564440 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Clinical and Biological Safety Study of the BTT Hyperthermia in Adult Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarc AbreuRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsSafety StudyArmsHyperthermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Capacitive heating devices for therapeutic hyperthermia: a review of essential physical characteristics and challenges.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. FeIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina Maria LieblKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Sabine KutschanKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jennifer DörflerKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Lukas KäsmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Jutta HübnerKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. jutta.huebner@med.uni-jena.de.

Funding

Deutsche Krebshilfe 11583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperthermia is a generic term for different techniques using heat in cancer therapies. Temperatures of about 42° Celsius in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy may improve the effectiveness of those treatments. Clinical benefit is shown in "standard hyperthermia" with tumour temperatures assessed during treatment. This systematic review thoroughly assesses the state of evidence concerning the benefits and side effects of electro hyperthermia or whole-body hyperthermia ("alternative hyperthermia") in oncology. From 26 April 2021 to 09 May 2021, a systematic search was conducted searching five electronic databases (Embase, Cochrane, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Medline) to find studies concerning the use, effectiveness and potential harm of alternative medical hyperthermia therapy on cancer patients. From all 47,388 search results, 53 publications concerning 53 studies with 2006 patients were included in this systematic review. The patients were diagnosed with different types of cancer. The hyperthermic methods included whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with different methods and electro hyperthermia (EH). The majority of the included studies were single-arm studies, counting in total 32 studies. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT). In addition, one systematic review (SR) was found. The most critical endpoints were tumour response, survival data, pain relief, myelosuppression and toxicities. Outcome was heterogeneous, and considering the methodological limitations, clinical evidence for the benefit of alternative hyperthermia in cancer patients is lacking. Neither for whole-body hyperthermia nor for electro hyperthermia there is any evidence with respect to improvement of survival or quality of life in cancer patients.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedNeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeElectro hyperthermiaExtracorporeal circulationNeoplasmWhole-body hyperthermia

Identifiers

PMID35767077
PMCPMC9244386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.