Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767036›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Impact of increasing total knee replacement constraint within a single implant line on coronal stability: an ex vivo investigation.

Pieter Berger, Darshan S Shah, Orçun Taylan, Josh Slane, Ronny De Corte, Lennart Scheys, Hilde Vandenneucker

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pieter Berger *Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. pieter.berger@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8838-3776
Darshan S Shah *Institute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Orçun TaylanInstitute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Josh SlaneInstitute for Orthopaedic Research and Training (IORT), Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Ronny De CorteSmith and Nephew Orthopaedics, 1930, Zaventem, Belgium.
Lennart Scheys *Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Hilde Vandenneucker *Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEIndian Institute of Technology Bombay · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the existence of diverse total knee implant designs, few data is available on the relationship between the level of implant constraint and the postoperative joint stability in the frontal plane and strain in the collateral ligaments. The current study aimed to document this relation in an ex vivo setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix fresh-frozen lower limbs underwent imaging for preparation of specimen-specific surgical guides. Specimens were dissected and assessed for joint laxity using the varus-valgus stress tests at fixed knee flexion angles. A handheld dynamometer applied tensile loads at the ankle, thereby resulting in a knee abduction-adduction moment of 10 Nm. Tibiofemoral kinematics were calculated using an optical motion capture system, while extensometers attached to medial collateral (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) measured strain. Native joint testing was followed by four TKA designs from a single implant line-cruciate retaining, posterior stabilised, varus-valgus constrained and hinged knee (HK)-and subsequent testing after each implantation. Repeated measures linear mixed-models (p < 0.05) were used to compare preoperative vs. postoperative data on frontal plane laxity and collateral ligament strain.

resultsIncreasing implant constraint reduced frontal plane laxity across knee flexion, especially in deep flexion (r

conclusionThe study demonstrated that increasing the constraint of a TKA resulted in lower frontal plane laxity of the knee. With implant features impacting laxity in the coronal plane, consequentially affecting strain in collateral ligaments, surgeons must consider these factors when deciding a TKA implant, especially for primary TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeJoint InstabilityKnee ProsthesisBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverHumansKnee JointRange of Motion, ArticularCollateral ligament strainCruciate retainingHinged kneeImplant constraintPosterior stabilisedVarus-valgus constrained

Identifiers

PMID35767036
OpenAlexW4283690621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.