Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35767024›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions.

Motokazu Sato, Yusuke Kurita, Eiji Sakai, Seitaro Watanabe, Haruto Sanada, Tomoki Shimizu, Kenji Kanoshima, Yusuke Takai, Koki Meguro, Yuichi Sugimoto and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Motokazu SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yusuke KuritaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan. kuritay@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-6707
Eiji SakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Seitaro WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Haruto SanadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomoki ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kenji KanoshimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yusuke TakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Koki MeguroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuichi SugimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yusuke BiwataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kunihiro HosonoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Noritoshi KobayashiDepartment of Oncology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kensuke KubotaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Atsushi NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa Ward, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe diagnosis of gallbladder lesions remains challenging. The efficacy of computed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with high b-values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of computed DWI with high b-values and the combination of computed DWI and ADC in differentiating malignant and benign gallbladder lesions.

methodsSixty patients (comprising 30 malignant and 30 benign lesions) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for gallbladder lesions were included in this retrospective study. Qualitative evaluations were performed using conventional DWI with b1000, computed DWI with b1500, b1000 DWI/ADC, and computed b1500 DWI/ADC, and their diagnostic performances were compared.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of computed b1500 DWI/ADC were 90% (27/30), 80% (24/30), and 85% (51/60), respectively. The accuracy of computed b1500 DWI/ADC was higher than that of conventional b1000 DWI (52%, 31/60, p < 0.001), computed b1500 DWI (72%, 43/60, p = 0.008), and b1000 DWI/ADC (78%, 47/60, p = 0.125). The specificity of computed b1500 DWI/ADC was also higher than that of conventional b1000 DWI (7%, 2/30, p < 0.001), computed b1500 DWI (47%, 14/30, p = 0.002), and b1000 DWI/ADC (67%, 20/30, p = 0.125). No significant difference was observed in the sensitivity between the groups.

conclusionThis study shows that computed DWI with high b-values combined with ADC can improve diagnostic performance when differentiating malignant and benign gallbladder lesions. Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions. *Computed DWI with b1500 combined with ADC can improve diagnostic performance when differentiating gallbladder lesions compared with conventional methods (b1000 DWI).

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGallbladderDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCholecystitisGallbladderGallbladder neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35767024
OpenAlexW4283707422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.