Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35766667›Full record

ReviewRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

A deep look into the rib cage compression technique in mechanically ventilated patients: a narrative review.

Yorschua Jalil, L Felipe Damiani, Roque Basoalto, María Consuelo Bachmman, Alejandro Bruhn

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06182553 (Effect of Expiratory Rib Cage Compression and/or PEEP-ZEEP Maneuver on Oxygenation, Ventilation, and Airway Secretions Removal in Mechanically Ventilated Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06182553 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effect of Expiratory Rib Cage Compression and/or PEEP-ZEEP Maneuver on Oxygenation, Ventilation, and Airway Secretions Removal in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamanhour UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled92ConditionsMechanically Ventilated PatientsArmsExpiratory Rib Cage Compression, PEEP-ZEEP Maneuver, ERCC + PEEP-ZEEP maneuver
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Yorschua JalilDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4993-7158
L Felipe DamianiDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-0488
Roque BasoaltoDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8908-7397
María Consuelo BachmmanDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-0591
Alejandro BruhnDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-1937
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defective management of secretions is one of the most frequent complications in invasive mechanically ventilated patients. Clearance of secretions through chest physiotherapy is a critical aspect of the treatment of these patients. Manual rib cage compression is one of the most practiced chest physiotherapy techniques in ventilated patients; however, its impact on clinical outcomes remains controversial due to methodological issues and poor understanding of its action. In this review, we present a detailed analysis of the physical principles involved in rib cage compression technique performance, as well as the physiological effects observed in experimental and clinical studies, which show that the use of brief and vigorous rib cage compression, based on increased expiratory flows (expiratory-inspiratory airflow difference of > 33L/minute), can improve mucus movement toward the glottis. On the other hand, the use of soft and gradual rib cage compression throughout the whole expiratory phase does not impact the expiratory flows, resulting in ineffective or undesired effects in some cases. More physiological studies are needed to understand the principles of the rib cage compression technique in ventilated humans. However, according to the evidence, rib cage compression has more potential benefits than risks, so its implementation should be promoted.

Indexed as

Pulmonary VentilationRespiration, ArtificialExhalationHumansPressureRib Cage

Identifiers

PMID35766667
PMCPMC9345587
OpenAlexW4283728327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.