Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35766659›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial study protocol.

Eduardo Kattan, Jan Bakker, Elisa Estenssoro, Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-Tascón, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Daniel De Backer, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Jean-Louis Teboul, Ricardo Castro, Glenn Hernández

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Dobutamine administration: a proposal for a standardized approach.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Mean arterial pressure targets in intensive care unit patients receiving noradrenaline: An international survey.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. ANDROMEDA-SHOCK protocol in obstetrics.Intensive care medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Eduardo KattanDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1997-6893
Jan BakkerDepartamento de Pneumologia e Cuidados Intensivos, Columbia University Medical Center - Nova York, Estados Unidos.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8896-5688
Elisa EstenssoroServiço de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Interzonal de Agudos San Martin de La Plata - Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-7391
Gustavo Adolfo Ospina-TascónDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Universidad ICESI, Fundación Valle del Lili - Cali, Colômbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9370-3298
Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiInstituto de Pesquisa, HCor-Hospital do Coração - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-6263
Daniel De BackerDepartamento de Cuidados Intensivos, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles - Bruxelas, Bélgica.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9841-5762
Antoine Vieillard-BaronUnidade de Medicina Intensiva, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Hospital Ambroise Paré - Boulogne-Billancourt, França.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-3583
Jean-Louis TeboulServiço de Medicina Intensiva-Reanimação, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Université Paris-Saclay - Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, França.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-7820
Ricardo CastroDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-9891
Glenn HernándezDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidad Católica de Chile - Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-4087
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLFundación Valle del Lili · COHôpital Ambroise-Paré · FRHospital do Coração · BRHospital Italiano La Plata · ARSociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos · ESUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly reversion of sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion is essential for survival in septic shock. However, consensus regarding the best initial resuscitation strategy is lacking given that interventions designed for the entire population with septic shock might produce unnecessary fluid administration. This article reports the rationale, study design and analysis plan of the ANDROMEDA-2 study, which aims to determine whether a peripheral perfusion-guided strategy consisting of capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation based on clinical and hemodynamic phenotypes is associated with a decrease in a composite outcome of mortality, time to organ support cessation, and hospital length of stay compared to standard care in patients with early (< 4 hours of diagnosis) septic shock.

methodsThe ANDROMEDA-2 study is a multicenter, multinational randomized controlled trial. In the intervention group, capillary refill time will be measured hourly for 6 hours. If abnormal, patients will enter an algorithm starting with pulse pressure assessment. Patients with pulse pressure less than 40mmHg will be tested for fluid responsiveness and receive fluids accordingly. In patients with pulse pressure > 40mmHg, norepinephrine will be titrated to maintain diastolic arterial pressure > 50mmHg. Patients who fail to normalize capillary refill time after the previous steps will be subjected to critical care echocardiography for cardiac dysfunction evaluation and subsequent management. Finally, vasopressor and inodilator tests will be performed to further optimize perfusion. A sample size of 1,500 patients will provide 88% power to demonstrate superiority of the capillary refill time-targeted strategy.

conclusionsIf hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation demonstrates to be a superior strategy, care processes in septic shock resuscitation can be optimized with bedside tools.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPhenotypeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID35766659
PMCPMC9345585
OpenAlexW4283730043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.