Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35766644›Full record

ReviewLa Medicina del lavoro2022

Factors that facilitate and hinder the return to work after stroke: an overview of systematic reviews.

Giuseppe La Torre, Lorenza Lia, Federico Francavilla, Marta Chiappetta, Simone De Sio

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in La Medicina del lavoro, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Lived Experiences of Returning to Participation After Mild Stroke: A Phenomenological Study in Spain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Professional reintegration of stroke survivors and their mental health, quality of life and community integration.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Predictors of recurrent stroke and subsequent mortality among patients experiencing housing instability.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Return to work after ischaemic stroke in young adults: a scoping review.Central European journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Giuseppe La Torre. giuseppe.latorre@uniroma1.it.
Lorenza Lia. lorenza.lia@uniroma1.it.
Federico Francavilla. federicofrancavilla.ff@gmail.com.
Marta Chiappetta. marta.chiappetta@uniroma1.it.
Simone De Sio. simone.desio@uniroma1.it.
Kids' Brain Tumor Cure Foundation · USOspedale San Giuseppe · ITSwiss Federal University for Vocational Education and Training SFUVET · CHUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin SH. · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability in the industrialized world and a large part of stroke survivors is of working age. A very important goal for these people is to return to work after stroke as it facilitates independent living and guarantees a high level of self-esteem and life satisfaction.

aimTo find the main factors that facilitate and hinder the return to work (RTW) in people who suffered from stroke through an overview of systematic reviews.

methodsA systematic search using keywords and medical subject heading terms was conducted in January 2022, three electronic databases were searched: Medline (PubMed), Scopus and ISI Web. The articles that address the question of returning to work or maintaining employment of people of working age after stroke were included in the systematic review, as well as studies describing factors that facilitate and/or hinder RTW after stroke. Only systematic reviews written in English language were included in this overview.

resultsThe search revealed 180 records after removing duplicates, but only a total of 24 systematic reviews were included in the overview. This research shows that in people who have suffered from a stroke, individual abilities, socioeconomic factors, healthcare factors, and disabilities resulting from the stroke itself are the most critical factors influencing the RTW.  Conclusion: Future research should focus on cognitive disabilities, as main RTW hindering factor, and vocational rehabilitation, as the more suitable factor for improving the RTW in stroke survivors.

Indexed as

Return to WorkStrokeHumansRehabilitation, VocationalSurvivorsSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35766644
PMCPMC9437659
OpenAlexW4283734780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.