Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35766610›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2022

GASTRIC TWIST AFTER SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: A PROPOSAL FOR ENDOSCOPIC CLASSIFICATION.

Luciana T Siqueira, Fernando Santa-Cruz, João Paulo Pontual, Maria Amélia R Aquino, Luca T Dompieri, Flávio Kreimer, Álvaro A B Ferraz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Modified gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for helical stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luciana T SiqueiraHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, General Surgery Service - Recife - PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7970-3689
Fernando Santa-CruzHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Postgraduate in Surgery - Recife - PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3178-1036
João Paulo PontualHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Gastrintestinal Endoscopy Service- Recife - PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0763-2281
Maria Amélia R AquinoUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Medical School - Recife - PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1467-4631
Luca T DompieriUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Medical School - Recife - PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-4343
Flávio KreimerHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, General Surgery Service - Recife - PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-9987
Álvaro A B FerrazHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, General Surgery Service - Recife - PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-3927
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe twisting of the gastric tube is one of the main causes of persistent reflux and food intolerance after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). To date, there is no classification for gastric twist after SG. This study aimed to propose an endoscopic classification for this condition and outline the clinical profile of these patients with sleeve gastrectomy.

methodsPatients in the postoperative period of SG presenting endoscopic findings of gastric twist were included. All patients underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy 12 months after SG. The classification proposed consists of three degrees: degree I: mild rotation of the staple line without relevant shrinkage of the gastric lumen; degree II: moderate rotation of the staple line, leading to a focal area of fixed narrowing that requires additional maneuvers for its transposition; and degree III: severe rotation of the staple line leading to stenosis, with increased difficulty for transposition or complete blockage.

resultsOut of 2,723 patients who underwent SG, 45 (1.6%) presented gastric twist. Most patients were female (85%), with mean age of 39±10.4 years. In all, 41 (91.1%) presented degree I, 3 (6.7%) presented degree II, and 1 (2.2%) had degree III. Most patients were asymptomatic (n=26). Vomiting was the most prevalent symptom (15.5%). Statistically significant correlation of twisting degrees was not observed for both the presence of symptoms and the degrees of esophagitis.

conclusionGastric twist after SG is rare, with generally mild and asymptomatic presentation. The endoscopic classification was not statistically related to clinical presentation but set the ground for further analysis.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStomach

Identifiers

PMID35766610
PMCPMC9254382
OpenAlexW4285214416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.