Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35766592›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2022

Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial.

Nahid Manouchehrian, Nasrin Jiryaee, Faezeh Akbari Moheb

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07268924 (The Effect of Propofol Versus Lidocaine on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07268924 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Propofol Versus Lidocaine on Emergence Agitation in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled82ConditionsEmergence Delirium, AnesthesiaArmsPropofol, Lidocaine %2 ampoule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nahid ManouchehrianDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Besat Medical Center,Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan. manouchehrian@umsha.ac.ir.
Nasrin JiryaeeDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan. n.jeyriaee@umsha.ac.ir.
Faezeh Akbari MohebFaculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan. faezehakbarimoheb@yahoo.com.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laryngospasm is an important complication of tonsillectomies. This study aimed to compare the effects of propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy. This randomized clinical trial included 102 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly divided into two groups treated with 0.5 mg/kg propofol (group P) or 1 mg/kg lidocaine 2% (group L). The frequencies of laryngospasm (within 10 min after extubation), agitation, nausea, vomiting, mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were assessed in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 at a 95% confidence level. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age or weight. In the P group, the frequency of laryngospasm was significantly lower than L within10 minutes after extubation (4.1% versus 16.3%). Furthermore, the frequencies of agitation (p = 0.003), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.002) and mean heart rate (p = 0.026) were significantly higher in the L group than the P group. However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, MAP, SPO2, awakening time, length of stay in recovery and frequency of shivering. Propofol can reduce the incidence of laryngospasm, agitation, nausea and vomiting but it has no effect on the patient's awakening time and length of stay in recovery.

Identifiers

PMID35766592
PMCPMC9580534
OpenAlexW4283733671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.