ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022
Model-based characterization of the selectivity of neurons in primary visual cortex.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Filter-based models of suppression in retinal ganglion cells: Comparison and generalization across species and stimuli.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Cortical direction selectivity increases from the input to the output layers of visual cortex.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Applying Super-Resolution and Tomography Concepts to Identify Receptive Field Subunits in the Retina.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Scalable Gaussian process inference of neural responses to natural images.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Stereopsis without correspondence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical models are increasingly being used to understand the complexity of stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex (V1) in the context of complex time-varying stimuli, replacing averaging responses to simple parametric stimuli. Although such models often can more accurately reflect the computations performed by V1 neurons in more natural visual environments, they do not by themselves provide insight into V1 neural selectivity to basic stimulus features such as receptive field size, spatial frequency tuning, and phase invariance. Here, we present a battery of analyses that can be directly applied to encoding models to link complex encoding models to more interpretable aspects of stimulus selectivity. We apply this battery to nonlinear models of V1 neurons recorded in awake macaque during random bar stimuli. In linking model properties to more classical measurements, we demonstrate several novel aspects of V1 selectivity not available to simpler experimental measurements. For example, this approach reveals that individual spatiotemporal elements of the V1 models often have a smaller spatial scale than the neuron as a whole, resulting in nontrivial tuning to spatial frequencies. In addition, we propose measures of nonlinear integration that suggest that classical classifications of V1 neurons into simple versus complex cells will be spatial-frequency dependent. In total, rather than obfuscate classical characterizations of V1 neurons, model-based characterizations offer a means to more fully understand their selectivity, and link their classical tuning properties to their roles in more complex, natural, visual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.