Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35766221›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Real time volumetric MRI for 3D motion tracking via geometry-informed deep learning.

Lianli Liu, Liyue Shen, Adam Johansson, James M Balter, Yue Cao, Daniel Chang, Lei Xing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lianli LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Liyue ShenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Adam JohanssonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
James M BalterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Yue CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Daniel ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Lei XingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Funding

Optimizing MRI for Radiation Therapy Treatment PlanningR01EB016079 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BALTER, JAMES M, CAO, YUE · 2013 to 2022
$3.1M
Dual Modality X-ray Luminescence CT for in vivo Cancer ImagingR01CA227713 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI XING, LEI · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Leveraging deep learning for markerless motion management in radiation therapyR01CA256890 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI XING, LEI · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227713NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256890NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a geometry-informed deep learning framework for volumetric MRI with sub-second acquisition time in support of 3D motion tracking, which is highly desirable for improved radiotherapy precision but hindered by the long image acquisition time.

methodsA 2D-3D deep learning network with an explicitly defined geometry module that embeds geometric priors of the k-space encoding pattern was investigated, where a 2D generation network first augmented the sparsely sampled image dataset by generating new 2D representations of the underlying 3D subject. A geometry module then unfolded the 2D representations to the volumetric space. Finally, a 3D refinement network took the unfolded 3D data and outputted high-resolution volumetric images. Patient-specific models were trained for seven abdominal patients to reconstruct volumetric MRI from both orthogonal cine slices and sparse radial samples. To evaluate the robustness of the proposed method to longitudinal patient anatomy and position changes, we tested the trained model on separate datasets acquired more than one month later and evaluated 3D target motion tracking accuracy using the model-reconstructed images by deforming a reference MRI with gross tumor volume (GTV) contours to a 5-min time series of both ground truth and model-reconstructed volumetric images with a temporal resolution of 340 ms.

resultsAcross the seven patients evaluated, the median distances between model-predicted and ground truth GTV centroids in the superior-inferior direction were 0.4 ± 0.3 mm and 0.5 ± 0.4 mm for cine and radial acquisitions, respectively. The 95-percentile Hausdorff distances between model-predicted and ground truth GTV contours were 4.7 ± 1.1 mm and 3.2 ± 1.5 mm for cine and radial acquisitions, which are of the same scale as cross-plane image resolution.

conclusionIncorporating geometric priors into deep learning model enables volumetric imaging with high spatial and temporal resolution, which is particularly valuable for 3D motion tracking and has the potential of greatly improving MRI-guided radiotherapy precision.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotiondeep learningimage reconstructionmotion trackingMRI-guided radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35766221
PMCPMC10323755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.