Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765939›Full record

Observational studyActa ophthalmologica2023

IMPACT study: Impact of adherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal injections for macular disease during COVID 19-related confinement in France.

Victoire Hurand, Jean-Baptiste Ducloyer, Florian Baudin, Serge Aho, Michel Weber, Laurent Kodjikian, François Devin, Pierre-Henry Gabrielle, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Pascale Massin and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta ophthalmologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nonadherence to anti-VEGF intravitreal injections in patients with diabetic macular edema : The names of the authors.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Victoire HurandDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Jean-Baptiste DucloyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-1908
Florian BaudinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4976-9876
Serge AhoDepartment of Epidemiology, University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Michel WeberDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Laurent KodjikianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon 4, France.
François DevinCenter of Ophthalmology Monticelli Paradis, Marseille, France.
Pierre-Henry GabrielleDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9688-4845
Catherine Creuzot-GarcherDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3587-4598
Pascale MassinCenter of Ophthalmology Breteuil, Paris, France.
CFSR Research Net
CHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Ophtalmologique d'Imagerie et de Laser · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRMaison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adherence to French coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19)-related guidelines for intravitreal injection (IVI) practice on the visual outcomes of patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for macular diseases during the first lockdown period.

methodsObservational multicentre study including all patients from 18 centres with an IVI initially planned during the lockdown. Visual acuity (VA, ETDRS) was recorded at 1 and 4 months after lockdown. French COVID 19-related guidelines recommended maintaining IVI practice. We defined three groups of patients: A, adherent to guidelines; NA+, non-adherent with delayed IVIs; and NA-, non-adherent without IVIs performed during the lockdown. Risk factors for non-adherence and visual loss were studied.

resultsA total of 3020 eyes of 3020 patients, aged 77.8 ± 11.6 years, 59.8% women, were included. 59.3% were non-adherent(46.7% NA+, 12.6% NA-). A smaller decrease in VA at 4 months was observed in the A group than the NA+ and NA- group (-0.2 ± 6.7, -0.3 ± 6.9 and -1.5 ± 6.9, respectively [p < 0.001]). Factors associated with non-adherence were in multivariable analysis, older age, hospital practice, low-density population areas, high viral incidence areas, longer intervals between injection and treat and extent protocol. Factors associated with visual loss at 4 months in multivariable analysis were, being in the NA- group, older age, T&E and fixed regimens.

conclusionStrict adherence to guidelines was associated with better visual outcome, although most of our patients did not attend as planned. Identification of patients at risk could help in the future in case of a new pandemic lockdown.

Indexed as

COVID-19Retinal DiseasesWet Macular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACOVID-19intravitreal injectionnAMDvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID35765939
PMCPMC9350166
OpenAlexW4283709581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.