ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2022
Predictors of Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Elderly COVID-19 Patients in Korea.
Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood Transfusion Utilization in Patients with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the Republic of Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients who experience clinical deterioration from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) require blood transfusion support. We analyzed blood component usage in COVID-19 patients and identified the predictors of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in elderly (≥65 years) patients. Methods: Blood component usage in 882 COVID-19 patients hospitalized between January 24, 2020 and April 30, 2021 was analyzed. Elderly patients were categorized into transfused and non-transfused groups according to their RBC transfusion history; their demographic and clinical characteristics, disease severity, and outcomes were compared. Associations were determined using multiple logistic regression. Results: The overall transfusion rate was 8.3% (73/882), and the transfusion rate was 2.7% (14/524) in patients aged <65 years and 16.5% (59/358) in those aged ≥65 years. Among the 358 elderly patients, 344 patients, including 50 who received transfusion and 294 who did not, were enrolled for the analysis. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on admission were significantly higher in the transfused group, whereas Hb and platelet counts were significantly lower. Disease severity in the transfused group was relatively high on admission and increased thereafter. DM, intensive care unit entrance on admission, Hb, platelet count, and NLR on admission were independently associated with RBC transfusion. Conclusions: This study presents transfusion rates in COVID-19 patients according to age groups and predictors of RBC transfusion in elderly patients. The results provide a basis for developing a strategy for the medical treatment of infectious diseases emerging during pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.