Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765838›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Social influence in adolescence as a double-edged sword.

Lucas Molleman, Simon Ciranka, Wouter van den Bos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Determinants of Rule-Breaking in Adolescence.Journal of adolescence · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Why people follow rules.Nature human behaviour · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Social influence in adolescence as a double-edged sword.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucas MollemanDevelopmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-7173
Simon CirankaCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2067-9781
Wouter van den BosDevelopmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max Planck Institute for Human Development · DETilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social learning is fundamental to human development, helping individuals adapt to changing circumstances and cooperate in groups. During the formative years of adolescence, the social environment shapes people's socio-cognitive skills needed in adulthood. Although peer influence among adolescents is traditionally associated with risky and unruly conduct, with long-term negative effects on educational, economic and health outcomes, recent findings suggest that peers may also have a positive impact. Here, we present a series of experiments with 10-20-year-olds (

Indexed as

Peer InfluenceSocial LearningAdolescentAdultEducational StatusHumansPeer GroupSocial Environmentbelief updatingcooperationhuman developmentsocial influencesocial learning

Identifiers

PMID35765838
PMCPMC9240690
OpenAlexW4283693716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.