Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765811›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2022

Data-driven clinical improvement: Oncology nurse leaders' perceptions and experiences of organisational data reports.

Ann M Mazzella-Ebstein, Cynthia Paradiso, Kathleen Lynch, Judith E Arnetz, Margaret Barton-Burke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ann M Mazzella-EbsteinOffice of Nursing Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5401-991X
Cynthia ParadisoPace University, Pleasantville, New York, USA.
Kathleen LynchPsychiatry & Behavioral Science, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA.
Judith E ArnetzDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Margaret Barton-BurkeOffice of Nursing Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Leslie B Tyson Research EndowmentNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo elicit oncology nurse leaders' perceptions and experiences of accessing, using and interpreting report data at the unit level, and their suggestions for future reports.

backgroundNurse leaders are expected to use data reports for decisions about unit-level operations, yet data may be inaccessible, unavailable and lack relevance for improving patient care and unit-level outcomes.

methodsA purposeful sampling was used to recruit 12 unit-level nurse leaders. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic content analysis.

resultsConsistent themes included the lack of accurate, useful and meaningful data specifically related to patient care. Accessibility Challenges, Limits to Applicability and Suggestions for Improvement were the main themes.

conclusionNurse leaders require real-time data to effectively implement clinical interventions and practice changes for improving unit-level patient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse leaders emphasized that their insight into the development of customizable reports is crucial for obtaining meaningful data relevant to the varied unit-level health care setting. Reports targeting unit-level outcomes would provide meaningful data to facilitate clinical improvement where patient care is provided. Improved reports increase the likelihood of their use and the potential for enhancing the quality and safe care outcomes.

Indexed as

Nurse AdministratorsNurse CliniciansHumansLeadershipOrganizationsdata-drivennurse leader perceptionsnurse leadershipoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID35765811
PMCPMC9729362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.