Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765749›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022

Using gridCoal to assess whether standard population genetic theory holds in the presence of spatio-temporal heterogeneity in population size.

Enikő Szép, Barbora Trubenová, Katalin Csilléry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enikő SzépIST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Barbora TrubenováIST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6873-2967
Katalin CsilléryBiodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0039-9296

Funding

European UnionH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 704172Horizon 2020IST AustriaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSK-3\_190288Swiss National Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatially explicit population genetic models have long been developed, yet have rarely been used to test hypotheses about the spatial distribution of genetic diversity or the genetic divergence between populations. Here, we use spatially explicit coalescence simulations to explore the properties of the island and the two-dimensional stepping stone models under a wide range of scenarios with spatio-temporal variation in deme size. We avoid the simulation of genetic data, using the fact that under the studied models, summary statistics of genetic diversity and divergence can be approximated from coalescence times. We perform the simulations using gridCoal, a flexible spatial wrapper for the software msprime (Kelleher et al., 2016, Theoretical Population Biology, 95, 13) developed herein. In gridCoal, deme sizes can change arbitrarily across space and time, as well as migration rates between individual demes. We identify different factors that can cause a deviation from theoretical expectations, such as the simulation time in comparison to the effective deme size and the spatio-temporal autocorrelation across the grid. Our results highlight that F

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticChlorofluorocarbonsEthersGenetic VariationPopulation DensityPopulation Dynamics2,2-dichloro-1,1-difluoroethyl difluoromethyl etherChlorofluorocarbonsEthers2Dstepping stone modelcoalescencedemographyFstisland modelspatially explicit simulations

Identifiers

PMID35765749
PMCPMC9796524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.