ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2022
Optimization of Service Process in Emergency Department Using Discrete Event Simulation and Machine Learning Algorithm.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Emergency Medicine: Expert Consensus Opinion for Preparing the Workforce.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Hybrid modelling using simulation and machine learning in healthcare.Computers & operations research · 2026Review
- Combined Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation for Healthcare Process Optimization: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Analysis of articles in the Journal of Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine in 2022.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Integration of Machine Learning Algorithms and Discrete-Event Simulation for the Cost of Healthcare Resources.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency departments are operating with limited resources and high levels of unexpected requests. This study aimed to minimize patients' waiting time and the percentage of units' engagement to improve the emergency department (ED) efficiency. Methods: A comprehensive combination method involving Discrete Event Simulation (DES), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm, and finally solving the model by use of Genetic Algorithm (GA) was used in this study. After simulating the case and making sure about the validity of the model, experiments were designed to study the effects of change in individuals and equipment on the average time that patients wait, as well as units' engagement in ED. Objective functions determined using Artificial Neural Network algorithm and MATLAB software were used to train it. Finally, after estimating objective functions and adding related constraints to the problem, a fractional Genetic Algorithm was used to solve the model. Results: According to the model optimization result, it was determined that the hospitalization unit, as well as the hospitalization units' doctors, were in an optimized condition, but the triage unit, as well as the fast track units' doctors, should be optimized. After experiments in which the average waiting time in the triage section reached near zero, the average waiting time in the screening section was reduced to 158.97 minutes and also the coefficient of units' engagement in both sections were 69% and 84%, respectively. Conclusions: Using the service optimization method creates a significant improvement in patient's waiting time and stream at emergency departments, which is made possible through appropriate allocation of the human and material resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.