Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765507›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR2022

Preparation and Characterization of Nanosuspensions of Triiodoaniline Derivative New Contrast Agent, and Investigation into Its Cytotoxicity and Contrast Properties.

Mehmet Koca, Rukiye Sevinç Özakar, Emrah Ozakar, Recep Sade, Berhan Pirimoğlu, Nihal Şimsek Özek, Ferhunde Aysin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet Koca *Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1517-5925
Rukiye Sevinç Özakar *Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2972-8084
Emrah OzakarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Recep SadeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Berhan PirimoğluDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Nihal Şimsek ÖzekDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ferhunde AysinDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iodine-based contrast agents have limitations such as rapid clearance, potential renal toxicity, non-specific blood pool distribution, headache, and adverse events. Nowadays, it is quite common to work with nanosized systems in order to eliminate the side effects of contrast agents. This study aims to synthesize a new iodinated contrast agent, prepare its nanosuspension by using the nanoprecipitation method, investigate its cytotoxicity, and compare its contrast properties with iohexol and iopromide through in-vitro experiments. The values of nanosuspension particle size and zeta potential have been found to be ~ 400 nm and ~ (-) 15 mV, respectively. In-vitro cellular viability findings indicated that the nanosuspension has lower cytotoxicity than the iohexol and iopromide. In the computed tomography (CT) imaging study of contrast features of nanosuspensions and two commercial agents, which involved 86 CT examinations using 31 parameters and two different devices, it was found that iodine had a stronger presence in its nanosuspension form than in iohexol and iopromide, which were the other two commercial contrast agents, when used in equal amounts. Thus in the case of nanosuspensions contrast brightness was achieved by using less iodine, while the same brightness could be obtained with higher doses of iohexol and iopromide. CT imaging therefore be done without much chemical use, which indicates that it may witness fewer side effects in the future.

Indexed as

CT ImagingCytotoxicityNanosuspensionRadiocontrast AgentStabilitySynthesisViscosity

Identifiers

PMID35765507
PMCPMC9191222
OpenAlexW4220926268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.