Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765499›Full record

ReviewVeterinary world2022

Success in animal skin fashion in African countries or the boom of the wet market.

Andile Ephraim Mkhonza, Keitiretse Molefe, Odirile Thato Lebogang Ramafoko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary world, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andile Ephraim MkhonzaDepartment of Animal Health, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa.
Keitiretse MolefeDepartment of Animal Health, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa.
Odirile Thato Lebogang RamafokoDepartment of Animal Health, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world and the way things are done have changed, from selling clothing in brick-and-mortar stores to online shopping through social media platforms. Population growth has significantly contributed to an increased clothing demand, which, in turn, has increased the demand for animal skin. Traditional markets, also known as wet markets, are considered as major zoonotic disease reservoirs due to human and animal contact. Some groups and individuals continue to believe in traditional medicine and clothing that is made from animal skin, and such beliefs are more accessible with the presence of wet markets. Hence, animal poaching and trafficking have increased to meet the high demands, primarily in the Western world. Poverty is a well-known motivation to commit a crime. Conservationists should not only look at the animal regulation site to propose a solution to animal poaching and trafficking but should also consider communal poverty. Thus, this review aimed to highlight the role of wet market and animal skin fashion on animal welfare and human health.

Indexed as

animal welfareclothingdisease reservoirspoverty

Identifiers

PMID35765499
PMCPMC9210831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.