ArticleCureus2022
Changing Frequency of the Use of Intraoperative Equipment Among Neurosurgeons, Neurosurgery Residency Faculty, and Neurosurgery Residents.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging uses of 5-aminolevulinic-acid-induced protoporphyrin IX in medicine: a review of multifaceted, ubiquitous, molecular diagnostic, therapeutic, and theranostic opportunities.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Review
- Comparison of minimal detectable protoporphyrin IX concentrations with a loupe device and conventional 5-ALA fluorescence microscopy: an experimental study.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurosurgical procedures have relied on the use of various intraoperative equipment since its advent. These include an operative microscope, ultrasound, and loupes with a headlight. The necessity of these pieces of equipment makes them vital in the training of residents as well. A national survey utilizing a Likert scale to determine how often loupes, microscopes, and ultrasound were used for various neurosurgeries was created. This was then compared to a single program's responses, and it identified that the practice parameters of residents closely modeled those behaviors portrayed by their attending mentors. It appears that the higher frequency of use by residents when compared to faculty and neurosurgeons nationwide highlights the importance of this equipment in training neurosurgical residents. As such, they should be available to residents from the onset of training to promote the highest quality of learning. Faculty should encourage the use of this equipment by leading by example, and residents, in turn, should use all the available equipment as often as possible to maximize the quality of their training. Modulating the use of learning technologies can be accomplished if it is a nationally accepted practice, discussed in an academic setting with the residents, and modeled by the faculty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.