Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765355›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2022

Comparative mechanical testing for different orthodontic aligner materials over time - in vitro study.

Clara-Marie Nowak, Ahmed Othman, Dragan-Alexander Ströbele, Constantin von See

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clara-Marie NowakResearcher in the digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM department- Danube Private University- Austria.
Ahmed OthmanAssistant Professor, Research Center for Digital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500 Krems, Austria.
Dragan-Alexander StröbeleResearcher in the digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM department- Danube Private University- Austria.
Constantin von SeeProfessor and Director of Research Center for Digital Technologies in Dentistry and CAD/CAM, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500 Krems, Austria.
Danube Private University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study is to mechanically evaluate and compare the forces over 12 hours on different orthodontic aligners manufactured by Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG). Material and Methods: Twelve orthodontic aligner specimens will be produced by a thermoforming laboratory vacuum machine. All specimens will be divided into two equal groups, group A representing Duran (Scheu Dental GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany) and group B representing Erkodur (Erkodent, Pfalzgrafenweiler, Germany). These specimens will be fabricated via CAD/CAM technology by scanning a Frasaco model (Henry Schein Dental, Gallin, Germany) using D 800 (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and printed via a Varseo S machine using Varseo ModelWax material (BEGO, Bremen, Germany). Group A specimens are manufactured by a Twinster thermoforming machine (Scheu Dental GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany) while group B is produced using Erkoform thermoforming machine (Erkodent, Pfalzgrafenweiler, Germany). Afterwards, a tooth will be removed from the printed model and replaced by an ivory tooth (Henry Schein Dental, Gallin, Germany) to apply forces at a predicted measured centre of resistance. The universal testing machine Z010 (ZwickRoell, Ulm, Germany) will be used for mechanical testing with 0.3 mm displacement over 12 hours. Statistical analysis was performed using Sigmaplot 13.0 (Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany). Behaviours over time were analysed using R2-regression analysis (SPSS 26.0, IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, USA). Results: There is no statistically significant difference in the maximum force between both groups ( Conclusions: The PETG material has no influence on the produced mechanical forces regardless of the manufacturing company. The forces over time showed no tendency towards a lower boundary of force.

Identifiers

PMID35765355
PMCPMC9233917
OpenAlexW4283726351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.