Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765236›Full record

ArticleViolence against women2022

The Experiences of Women and Healthcare Providers in Assessing the History of Gender-Based Violence During Perinatal Care.

Jila Mirlashari, Lori A Brotto, Janet Lyons, Ann Pederson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Violence against women, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jila MirlashariWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of OBGYN, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4091-7185
Lori A BrottoWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of OBGYN, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Janet LyonsDivision of General Gynecology & Obstetrics, BC Women's Hospital, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, Canada.
Ann PedersonSchool of Population and Public Health, BC Centre of Excellence for Women's Health, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its prevalence and consequences, perinatal healthcare providers' identification of gender-based violence (GBV) remains controversial in British Columbia. This study investigated women and healthcare providers' perspectives regarding their experiences with and views of inquiring about GBV during perinatal care. Twelve in-depth interviews were conducted with women with a history of GBV and 16 perinatal healthcare providers. Data were analyzed thematically. Three themes, including "barriers to disclosure," "healthcare providers hesitate to open Pandora's Box," and "how to ask in a culturally safe way," emerged from the data. Study participants support inquiry about GBV during perinatal healthcare.

Indexed as

Gender-Based ViolenceChildDisclosureFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal CarePregnancyPrevalencegender-based violenceperinatal periodscreeningwomen, healthcare provider

Identifiers

PMID35765236
PMCPMC9530537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.