Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765217›Full record

Trial reportMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2022

Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Up to 5 years of follow-up in the DAYBREAK open-label extension trial.

Bruce Ac Cree, Krzysztof W Selmaj, Lawrence Steinman, Giancarlo Comi, Amit Bar-Or, Douglas L Arnold, Hans-Peter Hartung, Xavier Montalbán, Eva K Havrdová, James K Sheffield and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The Art of Sequencing Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Choosing initial MS therapy; personal, disease, and medication factors.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Switch from fingolimod to ozanimod for safety or intolerance reasons.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bruce Ac CreeWeill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7689-2533
Krzysztof W SelmajCenter for Neurology, Łódź, Poland and Collegium Medicum, Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Lawrence SteinmanDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Giancarlo ComiVita-Salute San Raffaele University and Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Amit Bar-OrCenter for Neuroinflammation and Experimental Therapeutics, and Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Douglas L ArnoldNeuroRx Research and Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4266-0106
Hans-Peter HartungDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany/Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia/Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria/Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Xavier MontalbánDepartment of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva K HavrdováDepartment of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
James K SheffieldBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Neil MintonBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Chun-Yen ChengBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Diego SilvaBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Ludwig KapposResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), Departments of Head, Spine and Neuromedicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine, and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-5509
Jeffrey A CohenMellen Center for MS Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9245-9772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOzanimod, an oral sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 5 modulator, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of relapsing forms of MS.

objectiveTo characterize long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod.

methodsPatients with relapsing MS who completed a phase 1‒3 ozanimod trial were eligible for an open-label extension study (DAYBREAK) of ozanimod 0.92 mg/d. DAYBREAK began 16 October 2015; cutoff for this interim analysis was 2 February 2021.

resultsThis analysis included 2494 participants with mean 46.8 (SD 11.9; range 0.033‒62.7) months of ozanimod exposure in DAYBREAK. During DAYBREAK, 2143 patients (85.9%) had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; similar in nature to those in the parent trials), 298 (11.9%) had a serious TEAE, and 75 (3.0%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Serious infections (2.8%), herpes zoster infections (1.7%), confirmed macular edema cases (0.2%), and cardiac TEAEs (2.8%) were infrequent. Adjusted annualized relapse rate was 0.103 (95% confidence interval, 0.086‒0.123). Over 48 months, 71% of patients remained relapse free. Adjusted mean numbers of new/enlarging T2 lesions/scan and gadolinium-enhancing lesions were low and similar across parent trial treatment subgroups.

conclusionsThis long-term extension of ozanimod trials confirmed a favorable safety/tolerability profile and sustained benefit on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity.

Indexed as

IndansMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingOxadiazolesFollow-Up StudiesHumansRecurrenceSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsIndansOxadiazolesozanimodSphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptorsadverse eventsclinical efficacyextension studyMultiple sclerosisozanimodsphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators

Identifiers

PMID35765217
PMCPMC9493410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.