Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765182›Full record

ReviewMicrobiologyOpen2022

Introduction to the principles and methods underlying the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes from metagenomic data.

Gleb Goussarov, Mohamed Mysara, Peter Vandamme, Rob Van Houdt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MicrobiologyOpen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. From microbiome composition to functional engineering, one step at a time.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gleb GoussarovMicrobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Mohamed MysaraMicrobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Peter VandammeLaboratory of Microbiology and BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Rob Van HoudtMicrobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7459-496X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of metagenomics offers a leap forward for understanding the genetic diversity of microorganisms in many different complex environments by providing a platform that can identify potentially unlimited numbers of known and novel microorganisms. As such, it is impossible to imagine new major initiatives without metagenomics. Nevertheless, it represents a relatively new discipline with various levels of complexity and demands on bioinformatics. The underlying principles and methods used in metagenomics are often seen as common knowledge and often not detailed or fragmented. Therefore, we reviewed these to guide microbiologists in taking the first steps into metagenomics. We specifically focus on a workflow aimed at reconstructing individual genomes, that is, metagenome-assembled genomes, integrating DNA sequencing, assembly, binning, identification and annotation.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMetagenomicsComputational BiologySequence Analysis, DNAannotationassemblybinningmetagenome-assembled genomemetagenomicssequencing

Identifiers

PMID35765182
PMCPMC9179125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.