Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765083›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health systems2022

Effectiveness of relaxation techniques 'as an active ingredient of psychological interventions' to reduce distress, anxiety and depression in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Syed Usman Hamdani, Zill-E-Huma, Syeda Wajeeha Zafar, Nadia Suleman, Um-Ul-Baneen, Ahmed Waqas, Atif Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Developmental stability and change in emotion regulation strategies and strategy repertoires across adolescence.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Syed Usman HamdaniGlobal Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan. syedusmanhamdani@gmail.com.
Zill-E-HumaGlobal Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Syeda Wajeeha ZafarGlobal Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nadia SulemanGlobal Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Um-Ul-BaneenGlobal Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ahmed WaqasHuman Development Research Foundation (HDRF), Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Atif RahmanInstitute of Population Health, Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University · PKHuman Development Research Foundation · PKUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent depression and anxiety are among the leading contributors to health burden worldwide. 'Relaxation Techniques (RTs)' are a "set of strategies to improve physiological response to stress" and are frequently cited as an active ingredient of trans-diagnostic, psychosocial interventions for scaling-up care for preventing and treating these conditions in adolescents. However, there is a little evidence on the effectiveness of 'relaxation techniques' for this age group.

aimAs a part of the Wellcome Trust's Active Ingredients commission, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of RTs to reduce the symptoms of distress, anxiety and depression in young people, aged 14 to 24 years old, globally.

methodsWe searched 10 academic databases to include 65 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of relaxation-based interventions for young people with the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Primary outcomes were reduction in symptoms of distress, anxiety and/or depression. We employed the Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) guidelines to assess certainty of outcomes pertaining to anxiety, depression and distress. Standardized mean difference was estimated using effect size.

resultsThe analysis of 65 RCTs with 8009 young people showed that RTs were highly effective in treating anxiety (pooled effect size of (Standardized Mean Difference-SMD) - 0.54 (95% CI - 0.69 to - 0.40); moderately effective in reducing distress (SMD = - 0.48, 95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.24) and had only a weak effect on improving depression in young people (SMD = - 0.28 (95% CI - 0.40% to - 0.15). Face-to-face delivered relaxation techniques yielded higher effect size (SMD = - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.30) compared to online delivery (SMD = - 0.22, 95% CI - 0.48 to 0.04) for anxiety.

conclusionMost of the included studies were from High Income Countries (HICs) and had a high risk of bias. Further high-quality studies with low risk of bias, especially from low resource settings are needed to evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of RTs as an active ingredient of psychological interventions to reduce the symptoms of distress, anxiety and depression in young people.

Indexed as

Active ingredientsAnxiety and depression in young peopleMeta-regressionRelaxation techniquesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35765083
PMCPMC9238062
OpenAlexW4283646284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.