Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765048›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2022

How can community-based (re)engagement initiatives meet the needs of 'NEET' young people? Findings from the theory gleaning phase of a realist evaluation in Sweden.

Frida Jonsson, Anne C Gotfredsen, Isabel Goicolea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frida JonssonDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. frida.jonsson@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-3798
Anne C GotfredsenDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-2233
Isabel GoicoleaDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8114-4705

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2020-01339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere has been a lack of systematic and theoretically underpinned evaluations, internationally and in Sweden, of local multi-component initiatives delivered outside public employment services and formal education systems to young people who are not in employment, education or training ('NEETs'). To bridge this knowledge gap, the objective of this study was to present findings from the theory gleaning phase of a realist evaluation aimed at assessing how Swedish community-based initiatives may work to (re)engage vulnerable 'NEET' young people in education or employment, under what conditions and why.

resultsBased on insights gleaned and synthesised from various sources, three candidate programme theories were elicited drawing attention to the importance of community-based initiatives in Sweden adopting a 'caring approach', a 'capability approach' and a 'collaborative approach' to (re)engage 'NEET' young people in education or employment. While limited to the initial phase of theory gleaning, the study provides valuable insights into the potential functioning of (re)engagement initiatives directed towards vulnerable 'NEETs' in addition to increasing the transparency of a highly iterative research project.

Indexed as

EmploymentAdolescentEducational StatusHumansSwedenNEETRealist evaluation(Re)engagementSwedenTheory gleaningYoung people

Identifiers

PMID35765048
PMCPMC9238158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.