Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765014›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2022

Applying a gender lens to social norms, couple communication and decision making to increase modern contraceptive use in Ethiopia, a mixed methods study.

Nandita Kapadia-Kundu, Habtamu Tamene, Minyahil Ayele, Feleke Dana, Simon Heliso, Sanjanthi Velu, Tsega Berhanu, Guda Alemayehu, Lindsey Leslie, Michelle Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Barriers to modern contraceptive utilization in Ethiopia.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nandita Kapadia-KunduJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA. nkapadi4@jhu.edu.
Habtamu TameneJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Ethiopia, Africa Avenue (Bole Road) Dembel City Center 10th Floor, P.O. Box: 26171 Code 1000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Minyahil AyeleJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Ethiopia, Africa Avenue (Bole Road) Dembel City Center 10th Floor, P.O. Box: 26171 Code 1000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Feleke DanaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Ethiopia, Africa Avenue (Bole Road) Dembel City Center 10th Floor, P.O. Box: 26171 Code 1000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Simon HelisoJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Ethiopia, Africa Avenue (Bole Road) Dembel City Center 10th Floor, P.O. Box: 26171 Code 1000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sanjanthi VeluJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
Tsega BerhanuJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Ethiopia, Africa Avenue (Bole Road) Dembel City Center 10th Floor, P.O. Box: 26171 Code 1000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Guda AlemayehuUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID/Ethiopia), 3Q57+9C7, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Lindsey LeslieJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
Michelle KaufmanJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthiopia, sub-Saharan Africa's second most populous country has seen improvements in women's reproductive health. The study objectives are (1) using mixed methods research, to identify determinants of contraceptive use in four regions of Ethiopia, and (2) to explore the relationship between social norms, gender equitable norms, couple communication and contraceptive use.

methodsThe study includes both quantitative and qualitative methods. Researchers interviewed a total of 2770 women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in 2016 using a structured survey covering six health areas. Eligible households were identified using a multi-stage cluster-sampling technique. Using probability proportionate to size sampling, the researchers selected 10% of the proposed target woredas (24 of 240 woredas). The qualitative study included 8 rapid assessments, 16 in-depth interviews, 24 key informant interviews, and 16 focus group discussions. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo version 8.

resultsAdjusted odds ratios were estimated for current modern family planning use among married women with logistic regression. The primary influencing factors for contraceptive use are gender equitable norms, high self-efficacy, and weekly exposure to the radio. Qualitative data indicate that the timing of contraceptive use is linked to the social norm of the desired family size of 4-5 children. Gender inequity is evident in couple communication with men controlling decision making even if women initiated conversations on family planning. A key finding based on an inductive analysis of qualitative data indicates that the micro-processes of couple communication and decision making are often dictated by male advantage. The study identified six micro-processes that lead to gender inequity which need to be further examined and researched.

conclusionsBarriers to contraceptive use include unequal couple communication and compromised decision making. Inequitable gender norms are also barriers to modern contraceptive use. The study recommends using a gender lens to study couple communication and decision making, with the goal of making both processes more equitable to accelerate the adoption of modern family planning methods in Ethiopia.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsSocial NormsAdolescentAdultChildCommunicationContraception BehaviorDecision MakingEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultContraceptive AgentsCouple communicationDecision makingEthiopiaFamily planningGender equity normsMixed methods studySocial norms

Identifiers

PMID35765014
PMCPMC9237964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.